Vorce-West T E, Barstow L, Butcher B
Oregon State University College of Pharmacy, Portland 97201.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1989 Nov;46(11):2300-3.
The development and implementation of a system to improve voluntary reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is described. A preliminary study comparing three concurrent voluntary reporting systems at a 327-bed university teaching hospital demonstrated the ability of medical records personnel to identify ADRs that were documented in the medical record but not reported under the voluntary system. It was concluded that a concurrent voluntary reporting system would be coupled with a medical record review process that would focus reporting on clinically important and unexpected ADRs. Failures to report ADRs would be handled through existing procedures of staff privilege allocation and peer review. The baseline ADR rate was determined. A telephone reporting system was established for the medical staff. After review of reported reactions by pharmacy, feedback was provided to ADR reporters and the medical staff. During the first three months under the new system, 9 of 114 documented ADRs were reported, compared with none in the three months before the program began. All ADRs defined as reportable were reported. An ADR-reporting system designed to encourage voluntary reporting of selected reactions, monitor the baseline rate of ADR occurrence, and assess compliance with reporting criteria appears to operate satisfactorily.
本文描述了一个旨在改善药品不良反应(ADR)自愿报告的系统的开发与实施情况。一项在一家拥有327张床位的大学教学医院对三个并行的自愿报告系统进行比较的初步研究表明,病历管理人员有能力识别病历中记录但未在自愿报告系统下报告的ADR。研究得出结论,并行的自愿报告系统将与病历审查流程相结合,该流程将重点报告具有临床重要性和意外的ADR。未报告ADR的情况将通过现有的员工特权分配和同行评审程序进行处理。确定了ADR的基线发生率。为医务人员建立了电话报告系统。在药房对报告的反应进行审查后,向ADR报告者和医务人员提供了反馈。在新系统实施的前三个月,114例有记录的ADR中有9例被报告,而在该项目开始前的三个月中无一例报告。所有被定义为应报告的ADR均被报告。一个旨在鼓励自愿报告特定反应、监测ADR发生的基线率并评估报告标准遵守情况的ADR报告系统似乎运行良好。