• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组织研究中的差异:我们应如何衡量它?

Disparity in organizational research: How should we measure it?

作者信息

Wei Xuhua, Allen Natalie J, Liu Yongmei

机构信息

Business School, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410083, People's Republic of China.

Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):72-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0585-0.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-015-0585-0
PMID:25893864
Abstract

Researchers can use the coefficient of variation (CV), Gini coefficient, standard deviation (SD), Theil index, or relative mean deviation (RMD) to measure organizational disparity. Because these five measures have different properties, however, using them interchangeably may lead to inconsistent findings. Using simulated team pay data, we conducted two simulation studies to examine the similarities and potential differences among these measures. The results showed that CV, Gini, Theil, and RMD were strongly related in most circumstances and that interchanging them had little impact on their relations with outcome variables. Differences were observed, however, when interchanging any of these four measures (CV/Gini/Theil/RMD) with SD, especially when samples were characterized by a seriously skewed distribution, a wide pay gap, and a high sample disparity. Given that SD does not meet some of the properties of disparity, and that it may underestimate correlations between disparity and outcome variables, we suggest that researchers use CV, Gini, Theil, or RMD, rather than SD, to assess organizational disparity.

摘要

研究人员可以使用变异系数(CV)、基尼系数、标准差(SD)、泰尔指数或相对平均偏差(RMD)来衡量组织差异。然而,由于这五种度量具有不同的属性,互换使用它们可能会导致结果不一致。我们使用模拟的团队薪酬数据进行了两项模拟研究,以检验这些度量之间的异同。结果表明,在大多数情况下,CV、基尼系数、泰尔指数和RMD密切相关,互换使用它们对其与结果变量的关系影响不大。然而,当将这四个度量(CV/基尼系数/泰尔指数/RMD)中的任何一个与SD互换时,会观察到差异,尤其是当样本具有严重偏态分布、较大薪酬差距和较高样本差异的特征时。鉴于SD不满足差异的某些属性,并且它可能会低估差异与结果变量之间的相关性,我们建议研究人员使用CV、基尼系数、泰尔指数或RMD,而不是SD,来评估组织差异。

相似文献

1
Disparity in organizational research: How should we measure it?组织研究中的差异:我们应如何衡量它?
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):72-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0585-0.
2
Inequality Measure of Leaf Area Distribution for a Drought-Tolerant Landscape Plant.耐旱园林植物叶面积分布的不平等度量
Plants (Basel). 2023 Aug 31;12(17):3143. doi: 10.3390/plants12173143.
3
Comparison of skewness coefficient, coefficient of variation, and Gini coefficient as inequality measures within populations.作为群体内不平等衡量指标的偏度系数、变异系数和基尼系数的比较。
Oecologia. 1989 Mar;78(3):394-400. doi: 10.1007/BF00379115.
4
[Association between income inequality and dental status in Japanese older adults: Analysis of data from JAGES2013].[日本老年人收入不平等与牙齿状况之间的关联:对JAGES2013数据的分析]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2017;64(4):190-196. doi: 10.11236/jph.64.4_190.
5
Racial/ethnic disparity in obesity among US youth, 1999-2013.1999 - 2013年美国青少年肥胖问题中的种族/族裔差异。
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2015 Nov 4;29(4):/j/ijamh.2017.29.issue-4/ijamh-2015-0068/ijamh-2015-0068.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2015-0068.
6
Geographical heterogeneity and inequality of access to improved drinking water supply and sanitation in Nepal.尼泊尔改善饮用水供应和卫生设施的获取情况存在地域差异和不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Apr 2;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0754-8.
7
Measurement of the Equality of the Drug Welfare Induction Level of Chinese Patients With Chronic Diseases in Gansu, Sichuan, Hebei, and Zhejiang Based on the Bivariate Theil-T Index Method.基于双变量泰尔指数法的甘肃省、四川省、河北省和浙江省慢性病患者药物福利诱导水平均等性测量。
Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 28;8:581533. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.581533. eCollection 2020.
8
On ratio measures of heterogeneity for meta-analyses.关于荟萃分析的异质性比测度。
Res Synth Methods. 2022 Jan;13(1):28-47. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1517. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
9
Evaluation of the Gini Coefficient in Spatial Scan Statistics for Detecting Irregularly Shaped Clusters.用于检测不规则形状聚类的空间扫描统计中基尼系数的评估。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170736. eCollection 2017.
10
Regional Disparity in Physical Resources in the Health Sector in Iran: A Comparison of Two Time Periods.伊朗卫生部门物质资源的地区差异:两个时期的比较
Iran J Public Health. 2015 Jun;44(6):848-54.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and usefulness of Gini coefficients of primary care visits as a measure of service inequality: preliminary findings from a cross-sectional study using region-wide electronic medical records in Anhui, China.以基层医疗就诊基尼系数衡量服务不平等的可行性与效用:基于中国安徽全省电子病历的横断面研究初步结果
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 5;15(2):e083795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083795.