Araz Coskun, Zeyneloglu Pinar, Pirat Arash, Veziroglu Nukhet, Camkiran Firat Aynur, Arslan Gulnaz
From the Department of Anesthesiology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Exp Clin Transplant. 2015 Apr;13 Suppl 1:301-5. doi: 10.6002/ect.mesot2014.p140.
Hemodynamic monitoring is vital during liver transplant surgeries because distinct hemodynamic changes are expected. The continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitor is a noninvasive device for continuous arterial pressure measurement by a tonometric method. This study compared continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring with invasive direct arterial pressure monitoring in living-liver donors during transplant.
There were 40 patients analyzed while undergoing hepatic lobectomy for liver transplant. Invasive pressure monitoring was established at the radial artery and continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring using a finger sensor was recorded simultaneously from the contralateral arm. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures from the 2 methods were compared. Correlation between the 2 methods was calculated.
A total of 5433 simultaneous measurements were obtained. For systolic arterial blood pressure, 55% continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurements were within 10% direct arterial measurement; the correlation was 0.479, continuous noninvasive arterial pressure bias was -0.3 mm Hg, and limits of agreement were 32.0 mm Hg. For diastolic arterial blood pressure, 50% continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurements were within 10% direct arterial measurement; the correlation was 0.630, continuous noninvasive arterial pressure bias was -0.4 mm Hg, and limits of agreement were 21.1 mm Hg. For mean arterial blood pressure, 60% continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurements were within 10% direct arterial measurement; the correlation was 0.692, continuous noninvasive arterial pressure bias was +0.4 mm Hg, and limits of agreement were 20.8 mm Hg.
The 2 monitoring techniques did not show acceptable agreement. Our results suggest that continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring is not equivalent to invasive arterial pressure monitoring in donors during living-donor liver transplant.
在肝移植手术期间,血流动力学监测至关重要,因为预计会出现明显的血流动力学变化。连续无创动脉压(CNAP)监测仪是一种通过张力测量法连续测量动脉压的无创设备。本研究比较了活体肝供者在移植过程中连续无创动脉压监测与有创直接动脉压监测的情况。
对40例接受肝移植肝叶切除术的患者进行分析。在桡动脉建立有创压力监测,并同时从对侧手臂使用手指传感器记录连续无创动脉压监测数据。比较两种方法测得的收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压。计算两种方法之间的相关性。
共获得5433组同步测量数据。对于收缩压,55%的连续无创动脉压测量值在直接动脉测量值的10%范围内;相关性为0.479,连续无创动脉压偏差为-0.3 mmHg,一致性界限为32.0 mmHg。对于舒张压,50%的连续无创动脉压测量值在直接动脉测量值的10%范围内;相关性为0.630,连续无创动脉压偏差为-0.4 mmHg,一致性界限为21.1 mmHg。对于平均动脉压,60%的连续无创动脉压测量值在直接动脉测量值的10%范围内;相关性为0.692,连续无创动脉压偏差为+0.4 mmHg,一致性界限为20.8 mmHg。
两种监测技术未显示出可接受的一致性。我们的结果表明,在活体肝移植供者中,连续无创动脉压监测与有创动脉压监测并不等效。