Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine İstinye University, İstanbul, Turkey
Balkan Med J. 2022 Sep 9;39(5):358-365. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2022.2022-3-130. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
Neuraxial anesthesia is a commonly used technique for cesarean section (C/S) because of its simplicity, rapid onset of action, and the requirement of lower doses of anesthetic agents with the lack of uteroplacental transfer. However, this type of anesthesia often causes sudden onset of hypotension, and its pathogenesis is not yet clearly understood.
To evaluate the efficacy and necessity of continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) by comparing it with non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) in order to understand whether it has advantages over oscillometric technique for detection of hypotensive episodes in healthy pregnant women who underwent C/S under neuraxial anesthesia.
A randomized controlled study.
This prospective study evaluated healthy pregnant women at term who were scheduled for elective C/S under spinal anesthesia. Subjects were randomly assigned into two groups to receive either CNAP and NIBP, or only NIBP. A 30% decrease in systolic blood pressure from either baseline or the measured values in the first two minutes, or if the systolic blood pressure was less than 90 mmHg, is considered hypotension. Pre-, peri-, and postoperative specifications; newborn characteristics; and complications were recorded and compared.
A total of 106 individuals were enrolled in the study, with 53 parturients in each group. They were equally distributed in both groups ( > 0.05). The oscillometric method failed to detect hypotension in 8 out of 29 pregnant women who were noted to be hypotensive with CNAP. The number of hypotension events detected was higher, and the time to detection of the first episode of hypotension was shorter in the CNAP group ( > 0.05). A total of four newborns required intensive care unit treatment, one of whom needed mechanical ventilator support, all born to mothers in the CNAP group ( > 0.05).
Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure in detecting hypotensive episodes does not provide an additional advantage to healthy pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section.
椎管内麻醉因其操作简单、起效迅速以及对麻醉药物剂量要求较低且无胎盘转移等优点,被广泛应用于剖宫产术(C/S)。然而,这种类型的麻醉常导致低血压的突然发作,其发病机制尚不清楚。
通过比较连续无创动脉压(CNAP)与无创血压(NIBP),评估其在健康孕妇中的有效性和必要性,以了解其在接受椎管内麻醉的 C/S 孕妇中检测低血压发作方面是否优于示波法。
随机对照研究。
这项前瞻性研究评估了择期行脊髓麻醉下 C/S 的足月健康孕妇。将受试者随机分为两组,分别接受 CNAP 和 NIBP 或仅 NIBP。收缩压从基线或前两分钟内的测量值下降 30%,或收缩压<90mmHg 时,认为出现低血压。记录和比较术前、术中和术后的情况;新生儿的特征;以及并发症。
共纳入 106 名患者,每组 53 名。两组患者分布均匀(>0.05)。在使用 CNAP 发现低血压的 29 名孕妇中,有 8 名使用示波法未能检测到低血压。CNAP 组检测到的低血压事件更多,首次低血压发作的检测时间更早(>0.05)。共有 4 名新生儿需要重症监护治疗,其中 1 名需要机械通气支持,均来自 CNAP 组的母亲(>0.05)。
在检测低血压发作时,连续无创动脉压并不能为接受选择性剖宫产的健康孕妇提供额外的优势。