CORR Insights(®): Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
作者信息
Rolfson Ola
机构信息
Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
出版信息
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3399-400. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4294-x. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
CORR Insights(®): Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3399-400. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4294-x. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
2
Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3391-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4245-6.
3
CORR Insights(®): High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Sep;473(9):3001-2. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4399-2. Epub 2015 Jun 13.
4
CORR Insights(®): What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3465-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4261-6. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
5
Clinical Faceoff: Where Are We Going With Femoral Stem Fixation in THA?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Nov;474(11):2349-2353. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4799-y. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
6
CORR Insights(®): Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Associated With a Unique Cementless Stem Design.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2054-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4119-3. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
7
Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3867-75. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4293-y.
8
What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3458-64. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4215-z.
9
Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2045-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4077-9. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
10
[A comparative study on short-term effectiveness between cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of femoral head after renal transplantation].
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;27(12):1409-13.
本文引用的文献
1
Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Mar 4;97(5):359-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00073.
2
Failure rate of cemented and uncemented total hip replacements: register study of combined Nordic database of four nations.
BMJ. 2014 Jan 13;348:f7592. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7592.
3
A review of current fixation use and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2052-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
4
Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study.
BMJ. 2012 Jun 14;344:e3319. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3319.
5
Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.
Int Orthop. 2011 Feb;35(2):289-98. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1198-y. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
6
The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association: a unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280,201 THRs.
Acta Orthop. 2009 Aug;80(4):393-401. doi: 10.3109/17453670903039544.
Zotero 插件