• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A review of current fixation use and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox.全髋关节置换术中当前固定使用和登记结局的回顾:非骨水泥悖论。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2052-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
2
Has the Use of Fixation Techniques in THA Changed in This Decade? The Uncemented Paradox Revisited.THA 中固定技术的使用在这十年中发生了变化吗?重新审视非骨水泥固定的悖论。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Apr;478(4):697-704. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001117.
3
Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?使用骨水泥型和非骨水泥型股骨假体进行初次全髋关节置换翻修术后的翻修率是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3391-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4245-6.
4
Editor's spotlight/Take 5: A review of current fixation usage and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox [DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7]. Interview by Seth S. Leopold.编辑聚焦/五分钟速览:全髋关节置换术中当前固定方式的应用及登记结果综述:非骨水泥型假体的矛盾之处[DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7]。作者:塞思·S·利奥波德 采访
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2047-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3017-4. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
5
[Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].[髋关节假体固定类型及患者年龄对全髋关节置换中期翻修率的影响]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(1):46-53.
6
Fixation, sex, and age: highest risk of revision for uncemented stems in elderly women - data from 66,995 primary total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.固定、性别和年龄:老年女性中未固定柄假体翻修风险最高——来自挪威关节置换登记处的 66995 例初次全髋关节置换术的数据。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb;91(1):33-41. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1682851. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
7
Improved survival of uncemented versus cemented femoral stems in patients aged < 70 years in a community total joint registry.在社区全关节登记处,年龄<70 岁的患者中,非骨水泥股骨柄与骨水泥股骨柄的生存率提高。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3588-95. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3182-5. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
8
Hybrid Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty Showed Improved Survival Over Cemented and Uncemented Fixation: A Single-Center Survival Analysis of 2156 Hips at 12-18 Years.混合固定全髋关节置换术的存活率优于水泥固定和非水泥固定:12-18 年单中心 2156 例髋关节的生存分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Nov;34(11):2711-2717. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.031. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
9
Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.未骨水泥固定和骨水泥固定初次全髋关节置换术:瑞典髋关节置换登记研究。
Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):34-41. doi: 10.3109/17453671003685400.
10
Despite Improved Survivorship of Uncemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis, Cemented Fixation Remains the Gold Standard: An Analysis of a National Joint Registry.尽管非骨水泥固定在全膝关节置换术治疗骨关节炎方面提高了生存率,但骨水泥固定仍然是金标准:国家关节登记处的分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1626-1633. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.047. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Clamshell Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Rarely Recognized Periprosthetic Injury Pattern.全髋关节置换术中蛤壳样骨折的处理:一种罕见的假体周围损伤模式。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 10;14(14):4896. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144896.
2
Femoral Fixation for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty-An International Registry Perspective.初次全髋关节置换术的股骨固定——基于国际注册机构的视角
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jun 23;34:101755. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101755. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Mixed Manufacturer Combination With a Cementless Hemispherical Dual Mobility Cup and Polished Taper-Slip Cemented Femoral Stem: Short- to Medium-Term Results in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Elderly Patients.混合制造商组合:采用非骨水泥型半球形双动髋臼杯和抛光锥形滑动骨水泥型股骨柄:老年患者初次全髋关节置换术的短期至中期结果
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jun 12;33:101710. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101710. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
[Periprosthetic fracture in hip replacement-risk factors and treatment].[髋关节置换术中假体周围骨折——危险因素与治疗]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04658-z.
5
Comparison of Different Materials in the Same-Sized Cemented Stems on Periprosthetic Fractures in Bone Models.相同尺寸骨水泥柄不同材料对骨模型假体周围骨折影响的比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2724. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082724.
6
No proportional relationship between shape and size of the femoral canal and the external proximal femur morphology in elderly patients.老年患者股管的形状和大小与股骨近端外部形态之间不存在比例关系。
J Orthop. 2025 Jan 15;67:118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.01.018. eCollection 2025 Sep.
7
UNCEMENTED HYBRID TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: REVISION RATE, REVISION RISK FACTORS, AND REVISION CAUSE.非骨水泥型混合全髋关节置换术:翻修率、翻修风险因素及翻修原因
Acta Clin Croat. 2023 Dec;62(4):652-658. doi: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.04.10.
8
Survey of Orthopedic Surgeons' Perceptions of Adopting an Initiative With Cemented Hip Hemiarthroplasties for Fractures.骨科医生对采用骨水泥型髋关节半关节置换术治疗骨折倡议的认知调查
Perm J. 2025 Mar 14;29(1):69-76. doi: 10.7812/TPP/24.140. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
9
Perioperative and short-term outcomes of cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity-matched analysis.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术的围手术期及短期疗效:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 12;145(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05709-4.
10
[Risk factors and prevention strategies for periprosthetic femoral fractures in hip arthroplasty].[髋关节置换术中股骨假体周围骨折的危险因素及预防策略]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;53(12):966-973. doi: 10.1007/s00132-024-04566-8. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study.髋关节置换术治疗骨关节炎患者的死亡率和翻修率:基于注册的队列研究。
BMJ. 2012 Jun 14;344:e3319. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3319.
2
A Scandinavian experience of register collaboration: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA).斯堪的纳维亚地区注册协作经验:北欧关节置换登记协会(NARA)。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93 Suppl 3:13-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00951.
3
Is there still a place for the cemented titanium femoral stem? 10,108 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.骨水泥型钛合金股骨柄是否仍有其用武之地?来自挪威关节置换注册中心的 10108 例报告。
Acta Orthop. 2012 Feb;83(1):1-6. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.645194. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
4
What's new in total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术的新进展
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 19;93(20):1944-50. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00656.
5
Comparison of total hip arthroplasty performed with and without cement: a randomized trial. A concise follow-up, at twenty years, of previous reports.水泥型与非水泥型全髋关节置换术的比较:一项随机试验。此前报告的简明 20 年随访结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 20;93(14):1335-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00448.
6
Population-based rates of revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.基于人群的初次全髋关节置换翻修率:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 20;5(10):e13520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013520.
7
Current practice patterns in primary hip and knee arthroplasty among members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons.美国髋关节和膝关节外科医师协会会员在初次髋关节和膝关节置换术中的现行实践模式。
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6 Suppl):2-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.033. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
8
Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.未骨水泥固定和骨水泥固定初次全髋关节置换术:瑞典髋关节置换登记研究。
Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):34-41. doi: 10.3109/17453671003685400.
9
Survivorship of a Charnley total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of thirty-five years, of previous reports.查恩利全髋关节置换术的生存率。对既往报告进行至少35年的简要随访。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Nov;91(11):2617-21. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01201.
10
Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports.采用多孔涂层髋臼组件的初次全髋关节置换术。对既往报告进行至少二十年的简要随访。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91(5):1130-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00168.

全髋关节置换术中当前固定使用和登记结局的回顾:非骨水泥悖论。

A review of current fixation use and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox.

机构信息

Harris Orthopaedic Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114-2696, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2052-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7. Epub 2013 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7
PMID:23539124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3676623/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The majority (86%) of THAs performed in the United States are uncemented. This may increase the revision burden if uncemented fixation is associated with a higher risk of revision than other approaches.

QUESTION/PURPOSES: We sought to investigate trends for use of uncemented fixation and to analyze age-stratified risk of revision comparing cemented, hybrid, and uncemented fixation as reported by national hip arthroplasty registries.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the annual reports of seven national hip arthroplasty registries; we included all national registries for which annual reports were available in English or a Scandinavian language, if the registry had a history of more than 5 years of data collection.

RESULTS

Current use of uncemented fixation in primary THAs varies between 15% in Sweden and 82% in Canada. From 2006 to 2010 the registries of all countries reported overall increases in the use of uncemented fixation; Sweden reported the smallest absolute increase (from 10% to 15%), and Denmark reported the greatest absolute increase (from 47% to 68%). Looking only at the oldest age groups, use of uncemented fixation also was increasing during the period. In the oldest age group of each of the registries we surveyed (age older than 65 years for England-Wales; age older than 75 years in three registries), cemented fixation was associated with a lower risk of revision than was uncemented fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing use of uncemented fixation in THA is a worldwide phenomenon. This trend is paradoxic, given that registry data, which represent nationwide THA outcomes, suggest that cemented fixation in patients older than 75 years results in the lowest risk of revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, systematic review. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

在美国进行的全髋关节置换术(THA)中,大多数(86%)采用非骨水泥固定。如果非骨水泥固定与更高的翻修风险相关,而其他方法的风险较低,那么这可能会增加翻修的负担。

问题/目的:我们旨在研究非骨水泥固定的使用趋势,并通过国家髋关节置换登记处报告的骨水泥固定、混合固定和非骨水泥固定的分析年龄分层的翻修风险,来分析不同固定方法的风险。

方法

从七个国家髋关节置换登记处的年度报告中提取数据;我们纳入了所有有英语或斯堪的纳维亚语年度报告的国家登记处,如果该登记处有超过 5 年的数据收集历史。

结果

在初次 THA 中,非骨水泥固定的当前使用率在瑞典为 15%,在加拿大为 82%。从 2006 年到 2010 年,所有国家的登记处都报告了非骨水泥固定使用率的总体增加;瑞典报告的绝对增加最小(从 10%增加到 15%),而丹麦报告的绝对增加最大(从 47%增加到 68%)。仅观察最年长的年龄组,在此期间非骨水泥固定的使用率也在增加。在所调查的每个登记处的最年长年龄组(英格兰-威尔士年龄大于 65 岁;三个登记处年龄大于 75 岁)中,骨水泥固定与较低的翻修风险相关,而非骨水泥固定则与较高的翻修风险相关。

结论

THA 中非骨水泥固定的使用日益增加是一个全球性现象。这种趋势是矛盾的,因为登记处数据代表了全国范围内的 THA 结果,表明在 75 岁以上的患者中使用骨水泥固定会导致最低的翻修风险。

证据水平

II 级,系统评价。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。