Velluzzi Fernanda, Secci Gianni, Sepe Vincenzo, Klersy Catherine, Shattock Marion, Foxon Richard, Songini Marco, Mariotti Stefano, Locatelli Mattia, Bottazzo Gian Franco, Loviselli Andrea
Department of Medical Sciences "Mario Aresu", University of Cagliari, AOU, SS 554, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy.
Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Acta Diabetol. 2016 Feb;53(1):73-9. doi: 10.1007/s00592-015-0751-y. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
Stable genetic background makes individuals from the Mediterranean island of Sardinia ideal to define the predictive power of islet-related autoantibodies (IRAs): glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA), tyrosine phosphatase-like antibodies (IA-2A), islet cell antibodies (ICA) to identify T1DM progressors. The aims of the present study were: (1) determination of IRAs reference limits in healthy non-diabetic Sardinian schoolchildren (SSc). (2) Predictive power evaluation of IRAs as single or combined determination to identify islet to identify T1DM progressors.
Between 1986 and 1994, 8448 SSc were tested for IRAs. All were followed up for 10 years. The predictive power of single or combination of IRAs was determined as hazard ratio (HR), sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve, negative and positive predictive value (NPV, PPV).
All 43 progressors to T1DM, but three showed at least one autoantibody positivity. HR for any single-autoantibody positivity was 55.3 times greater when compared to SSc negative for all IRAs. Any single autoantibody performed at least 64.9 % sensitivity with PPV always lower than 16 %. The best performing combination was ICA, plus IA-2A (showing 52.6 % sensitivity, 99.8 % specificity, 0.76 area under the ROC curve, 51.3 % PPV and 99.8 % NPV.
Determination of IRAs reference limits in healthy SSc by standard statistical methods is crucial to establish the power of IRAs as progression markers to T1DM. Our data offer a solid rationale for future testing of ICA and IA-2A as routine laboratory markers to identify individuals at high risk of T1DM in the general population.
稳定的遗传背景使得来自地中海撒丁岛的个体成为定义胰岛相关自身抗体(IRAs)预测能力的理想对象,这些自身抗体包括谷氨酸脱羧酶抗体(GADA)、酪氨酸磷酸酶样抗体(IA - 2A)、胰岛细胞抗体(ICA),用于识别1型糖尿病进展者。本研究的目的是:(1)确定健康非糖尿病撒丁岛学龄儿童(SSc)中IRAs的参考限值。(2)评估IRAs作为单一或联合检测来识别胰岛以确定1型糖尿病进展者的预测能力。
1986年至1994年间,对8448名SSc进行了IRAs检测。对所有对象进行了10年的随访。通过风险比(HR)、敏感性、特异性、ROC曲线下面积、阴性和阳性预测值(NPV、PPV)来确定单一或联合IRAs的预测能力。
所有43例进展为1型糖尿病的患者中,但有3例至少显示一种自身抗体阳性。与所有IRAs均为阴性的SSc相比,任何单一自身抗体阳性的HR高55.3倍。任何单一自身抗体的敏感性至少为64.9%,阳性预测值始终低于16%。表现最佳的组合是ICA加IA - 2A(敏感性为52.6%,特异性为99.8%,ROC曲线下面积为0.76,阳性预测值为51.3%,阴性预测值为99.8%)。
通过标准统计方法确定健康SSc中IRAs的参考限值对于确立IRAs作为1型糖尿病进展标志物的能力至关重要。我们的数据为未来将ICA和IA - 2A作为常规实验室标志物进行检测以识别普通人群中1型糖尿病高危个体提供了坚实的理论依据。