• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒性休克中他汀类药物治疗的持续使用与血管加压药的应用

Continuation of Statin Therapy and Vasopressor Use in Septic Shock.

作者信息

Zechmeister Carrie, Hurren Jeff, McNorton Kelly

机构信息

Spectrum Health Department of Pharmacy, Grand Rapids, MI, USA

St John Hospital and Medical Center Department of Pharmacy, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Jul;49(7):790-5. doi: 10.1177/1060028015579987. Epub 2015 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1177/1060028015579987
PMID:25896127
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have evaluated the use of statins in sepsis; however, no human studies have explored their effect on vasopressor requirements in septic shock.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to determine the effect of prehospital statin continuation on duration of vasopressor therapy in patients with septic shock. Secondary objectives included maximum and average vasopressor dose and in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, institutional board-approved, observational cohort study in a community teaching hospital; 119 adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with an ICD-9 code for septic shock and prehospital statin therapy were evaluated. Multivariate analyses were performed to address confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 1229 patients screened, 119 (10%) met inclusion criteria; 73 patients (61%) had a statin continued within 24 hours of ICU admission. Crude analysis demonstrated no difference in vasopressor duration in the statin versus no statin group (3.3 vs 4.8 days; P = 0.21). There was no difference in either maximum (17.9 ± 16.1 vs 23.8 ± 21.7 µg/min norepinephrine equivalents [NEQs]; P = 0.1) or average vasopressor dose (9.5 ± 8.4 vs 12.1 ± 11.5 µg/min NEQ; P = 0.17). There was a decrease in mortality in the statin patients (43% vs 67 %; P = 0.05). On adjustment for potential confounders, there was no difference in any outcome, with a persistent trend toward lower mortality in the statin group.

CONCLUSION

Continuation of prehospital statin therapy decreased neither duration nor dose of vasopressors in patients with septic shock but yielded a trend toward decreased mortality.

摘要

背景

已有研究评估了他汀类药物在脓毒症中的应用;然而,尚无人体研究探讨其对感染性休克患者血管升压药需求的影响。

目的

主要目的是确定院前继续使用他汀类药物对感染性休克患者血管升压药治疗持续时间的影响。次要目的包括血管升压药的最大剂量和平均剂量以及住院死亡率。

方法

这是一项在社区教学医院进行的回顾性、经机构委员会批准的观察性队列研究;对119例有脓毒性休克ICD-9编码且接受院前他汀类药物治疗的成人重症监护病房(ICU)患者进行了评估。进行多变量分析以处理混杂因素。

结果

在筛选的1229例患者中,119例(10%)符合纳入标准;73例患者(61%)在ICU入院后24小时内继续使用他汀类药物。粗分析显示,他汀类药物组与未使用他汀类药物组的血管升压药持续时间无差异(3.3天对4.8天;P = 0.21)。最大血管升压药剂量(去甲肾上腺素等效物[NEQs]分别为17.9±16.1对23.8±21.7µg/min;P = 0.1)或平均血管升压药剂量(9.5±8.4对12.1±11.5µg/min NEQ;P = 0.17)均无差异。他汀类药物治疗的患者死亡率有所下降(43%对67%;P = 0.05)。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,任何结局均无差异,他汀类药物组死亡率仍有降低趋势。

结论

院前他汀类药物治疗的持续应用既未降低感染性休克患者血管升压药的持续时间和剂量,但有降低死亡率的趋势。

相似文献

1
Continuation of Statin Therapy and Vasopressor Use in Septic Shock.脓毒性休克中他汀类药物治疗的持续使用与血管加压药的应用
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Jul;49(7):790-5. doi: 10.1177/1060028015579987. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
2
Effects of discontinuing or continuing ongoing statin therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective cohort study.在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中停止或继续进行他汀类药物治疗的效果:一项回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2011 Jul 18;15(4):R171. doi: 10.1186/cc10317.
3
A time-sensitive analysis of the prognostic utility of vasopressor dose in septic shock.脓毒性休克升压药剂量预后预测价值的时间敏感性分析。
Anaesthesia. 2021 Oct;76(10):1358-1366. doi: 10.1111/anae.15453. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
4
Influence of vasopressor agent in septic shock mortality. Results from the Portuguese Community-Acquired Sepsis Study (SACiUCI study).血管升压药对感染性休克死亡率的影响。葡萄牙社区获得性脓毒症研究(SACiUCI研究)的结果。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):410-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181958b1c.
5
A Non-Comparative Prospective Pilot Study of Ketamine for Sedation in Adult Septic Shock.氯胺酮用于成人感染性休克镇静的非对照前瞻性初步研究。
Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e409-e413. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy121.
6
Comparison of Vasopressor Duration in Septic Shock Patients With and Without Cirrhosis.比较肝硬化与非肝硬化脓毒性休克患者血管加压素持续时间。
Ann Pharmacother. 2021 Aug;55(8):970-979. doi: 10.1177/1060028020980727. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
7
Evaluation of Vasopressor Exposure and Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock.感染性休克患者血管活性药物暴露情况与死亡率的评估
Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):1445-1453. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004476.
8
Mortality, Morbidity, and Costs After Implementation of a Vasopressin Guideline in Medical Intensive Care Patients With Septic Shock: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.在脓毒性休克的重症监护患者中实施血管加压素指南后的死亡率、发病率和成本:一项中断时间序列分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Apr;54(4):314-321. doi: 10.1177/1060028019886306. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
9
Effects of Chronic Antihypertensives on Vasopressor Dosing in Septic Shock.慢性抗高血压药物对感染性休克中血管升压药剂量的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Jan;52(1):40-47. doi: 10.1177/1060028017726552. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
10
Effect of norepinephrine on the outcome of septic shock.去甲肾上腺素对感染性休克结局的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Aug;28(8):2758-65. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00012.

引用本文的文献

1
Implications of Statin Use on Vasopressor Therapy in the Setting of Septic Shock.他汀类药物在脓毒性休克情况下对血管加压药治疗的影响。
Hosp Pharm. 2018 Jun;53(3):152-156. doi: 10.1177/0018578718764932. Epub 2018 Mar 16.