Gonzalez-Rivas Diego, Bonome Cesar, Fieira Eva, Aymerich Humberto, Fernandez Ricardo, Delgado Maria, Mendez Lucia, de la Torre Mercedes
Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Unit (UCTMI), Coruña, Spain Department of Thoracic Surgery, Coruña University Hospital, Coruña, Spain
Department of Anesthesia, San Rafael Hospital, Coruña, Spain.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Mar;49(3):721-31. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv136. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
Thanks to the experience gained through the improvement of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) technique, and the enhancement of surgical instruments and high-definition cameras, most pulmonary resections can now be performed by minimally invasive surgery. The future of the thoracic surgery should be associated with a combination of surgical and anaesthetic evolution and improvements to reduce the trauma to the patient. Traditionally, intubated general anaesthesia with one-lung ventilation was considered necessary for thoracoscopic major pulmonary resections. However, thanks to the advances in minimally invasive techniques, the non-intubated thoracoscopic approach has been adapted even for use with major lung resections. An adequate analgesia obtained from regional anaesthesia techniques allows VATS to be performed in sedated patients and the potential adverse effects related to general anaesthesia and selective ventilation can be avoided. The non-intubated procedures try to minimize the adverse effects of tracheal intubation and general anaesthesia, such as intubation-related airway trauma, ventilation-induced lung injury, residual neuromuscular blockade, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesiologists should be acquainted with the procedure to be performed. Furthermore, patients may also benefit from the efficient contraction of the dependent hemidiaphragm and preserved hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction during surgically induced pneumothorax in spontaneous ventilation. However, the surgical team must be aware of the potential problems and have the judgement to convert regional anaesthesia to intubated general anaesthesia in enforced circumstances. The non-intubated anaesthesia combined with the uniportal approach represents another step forward in the minimally invasive strategies of treatment, and can be reliably offered in the near future to an increasing number of patients. Therefore, educating and training programmes in VATS with non-intubated patients may be needed. Surgical techniques and various regional anaesthesia techniques as well as indications, contraindications, criteria to conversion of sedation to general anaesthesia in non-intubated patients are reviewed and discussed.
得益于视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)技术的改进、手术器械和高清摄像头的升级所积累的经验,目前大多数肺切除术都可通过微创手术完成。胸外科的未来应与手术和麻醉技术的发展及改进相结合,以减少对患者的创伤。传统上,胸腔镜下的大型肺切除术被认为需要行气管插管全身麻醉并进行单肺通气。然而,由于微创技术的进步,非气管插管胸腔镜手术方法甚至已适用于大型肺切除术。区域麻醉技术所提供的充分镇痛使得在镇静患者中即可进行VATS手术,从而避免了与全身麻醉和选择性通气相关的潜在不良反应。非气管插管手术旨在尽量减少气管插管和全身麻醉的不良反应,如插管相关的气道创伤、通气诱导的肺损伤、残余神经肌肉阻滞以及术后恶心和呕吐。麻醉医生应熟悉即将进行的手术。此外,在手术诱发气胸时,患者在自主通气状态下,还可受益于受压半侧膈肌的有效收缩以及保留的低氧性肺血管收缩。然而,手术团队必须意识到潜在问题,并具备在紧急情况下将区域麻醉转换为气管插管全身麻醉的判断力。非气管插管麻醉联合单孔入路代表了微创治疗策略向前迈进的又一步,并且在不久的将来能够可靠地应用于越来越多的患者。因此,可能需要针对非气管插管患者开展VATS的教育培训项目。本文对手术技术、各种区域麻醉技术以及非气管插管患者的适应证、禁忌证、从镇静转换为全身麻醉的标准进行了综述和讨论。