Deng Han-Yu, Zhu Zi-Jiang, Wang Yun-Cang, Wang Wen-Ping, Ni Peng-Zhi, Chen Long-Qi
Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Gansu, China.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Jul;23(1):31-40. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw055. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
The short-term feasibility and safety of non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under loco-regional anaesthesia for thoracic surgery remains unknown. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to provide evidence for the short-term efficacy and safety profile of non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under loco-regional anaesthesia for thoracic surgery.
We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases and Google Scholar, as well as American Society of Clinical Oncology to identify relevant studies comparing non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under loco-regional anaesthesia with conventionally intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under general anaesthesia, dated up to 31 August 2015. Data concerning global in-operating room time, hospital stays, rate of postoperative complications and perioperative mortality were extracted and analysed. We conducted a meta-analysis of the overall results and two subgroup analyses based on study design (a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and a second meta-analysis of observational studies).
Four randomized controlled trials and six observational studies with a total of 1283 patients were included. We found that in the overall analysis, patients treated with non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under loco-regional anaesthesia achieved significantly shorter global in-operating room time [weighted mean difference = -41.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) = (-57.26, -26.67); P < 0.001] and hospital stays [weighted mean difference = -1.24; 95% CI = (-1.46, -1.02); P < 0.001] as well as a lower rate of postoperative complications [relative risk = 0.55; 95% CI = (0.40, 0.74); P < 0.001] than patients treated with intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under general anaesthesia. Subgroup meta-analyses based on study design achieved the same outcomes as overall analysis. In our meta-analysis, no perioperative mortality was observed in patients treated with non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under loco-regional anaesthesia.
Non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under loco-regional anaesthesia for thoracic surgery proved to be feasible and safe. Future multicentre and well-designed randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up are needed to confirm and update the findings of our study, as well as the long-term efficacy of non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under loco-regional anaesthesia.
局部区域麻醉下非插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术用于胸外科手术的短期可行性和安全性尚不清楚。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以提供局部区域麻醉下非插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术用于胸外科手术的短期疗效和安全性证据。
我们在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆数据库、谷歌学术以及美国临床肿瘤学会进行了系统的文献检索,以识别将局部区域麻醉下非插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术与全身麻醉下传统插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术进行比较的相关研究,检索截止日期为2015年8月31日。提取并分析了有关全球手术室时间、住院时间、术后并发症发生率和围手术期死亡率的数据。我们对总体结果进行了荟萃分析,并基于研究设计进行了两项亚组分析(随机对照试验的荟萃分析和观察性研究的第二项荟萃分析)。
纳入了四项随机对照试验和六项观察性研究,共1283例患者。我们发现,在总体分析中,局部区域麻醉下非插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗的患者的全球手术室时间显著缩短[加权平均差=-41.96;95%置信区间(CI)=(-57.26,-26.67);P<0.001],住院时间也显著缩短[加权平均差=-1.24;95%CI=(-1.46,-1.02);P<0.001],术后并发症发生率也低于全身麻醉下插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗的患者[相对风险=0.55;95%CI=(0.40,0.74);P<0.001]。基于研究设计的亚组荟萃分析得出了与总体分析相同的结果。在我们的荟萃分析中,局部区域麻醉下非插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗的患者未观察到围手术期死亡。
局部区域麻醉下非插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术用于胸外科手术被证明是可行和安全的。需要未来进行多中心且设计良好的随机对照试验,并进行更长时间的随访,以证实和更新我们的研究结果,以及局部区域麻醉下非插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术的长期疗效。