Warlick C, Feia K, Tomasini J, Iwamoto C, Lindgren B, Risk M
Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015 Sep;18(3):255-9. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2015.14. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
Limited information is known about the clinical significance of cancers diagnosed upon repeat biopsy for the indication of atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP). With increasing concern regarding overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer, and the reported rise in infectious complications related to prostate biopsy, we examined the outcomes of patients rebiopsied for a diagnosis of ASAP.
Clinical, pathologic and outcomes data of patients diagnosed with ASAP on prostate biopsy at our institutions between 2000 and 2010 were abstracted through chart review. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact and the two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Logistic regression evaluated risk factors for the probability of cancer following a diagnosis of ASAP.
A total of 349 patients met the inclusion criteria with median follow-up of 4.4 years. Median age was 65.3 years with a median PSA of 5.3 ng ml(-1). Of men diagnosed with ASAP, 250/349 (71.6%) had a repeat biopsy within 1 year with 94/246 (38.2%) demonstrating prostate cancer; only 26/245 (10.6%) had ⩾Gleason 7 disease. Of men diagnosed with ASAP, 284/349 (81.4%) underwent biopsy at some time during follow-up. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 132/279 (47.3%) of these men, 48/278 (17.3%) with ⩾Gleason 7 disease. Multivariate analyses suggested that older age, no previous biopsy and PSA density were predictive of cancer on repeat biopsy within 1 year from ASAP. Univariate analysis revealed PSA density was associated with the presence of ⩾Gleason 7 disease at 1 year and any time after a diagnosis of ASAP.
The overall rate of intermediate- and high-grade prostate cancer found on repeat biopsy for ASAP is low. Further investigation into ways to further risk stratify these men may be warranted. However, until such tests become available, repeat biopsy of men diagnosed with ASAP remains prudent.
对于因非典型小腺泡增生(ASAP)而进行重复活检诊断出的癌症的临床意义,目前所知信息有限。随着对前列腺癌过度诊断和过度治疗的日益关注,以及与前列腺活检相关的感染并发症报告增多,我们对因诊断为ASAP而接受重复活检的患者的结局进行了研究。
通过病历回顾提取了2000年至2010年间在我们机构经前列腺活检诊断为ASAP的患者的临床、病理和结局数据。统计分析包括Fisher精确检验和两样本Wilcoxon秩和检验。逻辑回归评估了诊断为ASAP后发生癌症概率的风险因素。
共有349例患者符合纳入标准,中位随访时间为4.4年。中位年龄为65.3岁,中位前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)为5.3 ng/ml。在诊断为ASAP的男性中,250/349(71.6%)在1年内进行了重复活检,其中94/246(38.2%)显示患有前列腺癌;只有26/245(10.6%)患有 Gleason 评分≥7分的疾病。在诊断为ASAP的男性中,284/349(81.4%)在随访期间的某个时间接受了活检。这些男性中有132/279(47.3%)被诊断患有前列腺癌,48/278(17.3%)患有 Gleason 评分≥7分的疾病。多变量分析表明,年龄较大、既往未进行过活检以及PSA密度可预测从ASAP起1年内重复活检时发生癌症的情况。单变量分析显示,PSA密度与诊断为ASAP后1年及任何时间患有 Gleason 评分≥7分的疾病相关。
因ASAP进行重复活检时发现的中高级别前列腺癌总体发生率较低。可能有必要进一步研究对这些男性进行进一步风险分层的方法。然而,在有此类检测方法之前,对诊断为ASAP的男性进行重复活检仍属谨慎之举。