Huix-Rotllant Miquel, Nikiforov Alexander, Thiel Walter, Filatov Michael
Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Str. 7, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Top Curr Chem. 2016;368:445-76. doi: 10.1007/128_2015_631.
Conical intersections are perhaps the most significant mechanistic features of chemical reactions occurring through excited states. By providing funnels for efficient non-adiabatic population transfer, conical intersections govern the branching ratio of products of such reactions, similar to what the transition states do for ground-state reactivity. In this regard, intersections between the ground and the lowest excited states play a special role, and the correct description of the potential energy surfaces in their vicinity is crucial for understanding the mechanism and dynamics of excited-state reactions. The methods of density functional theory, such as time-dependent density functional theory, are widely used to describe the excited states of large molecules. However, are these methods suitable for describing the conical intersections or do they lead to artifacts and, consequently, to erroneous description of reaction dynamics? Here we address the first part of this question and analyze the ability of several density functional approaches, including the linear-response time-dependent approach as well as the spin-flip and ensemble formalisms, to provide the correct description of conical intersections and the potential energy surfaces in their vicinity. It is demonstrated that the commonly used linear-response time-dependent theory does not yield a proper description of these features and that one should instead use alternative computational approaches.
锥形交叉点可能是通过激发态发生的化学反应中最重要的机理特征。通过为高效的非绝热布居转移提供通道,锥形交叉点控制着此类反应产物的分支比,这与过渡态对基态反应性的作用类似。在这方面,基态与最低激发态之间的交叉点起着特殊作用,正确描述其附近的势能面对于理解激发态反应的机理和动力学至关重要。密度泛函理论方法,如含时密度泛函理论,被广泛用于描述大分子的激发态。然而,这些方法是否适用于描述锥形交叉点,或者它们是否会导致人为假象,进而导致对反应动力学的错误描述呢?在这里,我们解决这个问题的第一部分,并分析几种密度泛函方法的能力,包括线性响应含时方法以及自旋翻转和系综形式,以提供对锥形交叉点及其附近势能面的正确描述。结果表明,常用的线性响应含时理论并不能对这些特征给出恰当描述,而应该使用替代的计算方法。