Suppr超能文献

将治疗升级作为特应性皮炎发作定义的验证。

Validation of treatment escalation as a definition of atopic eczema flares.

作者信息

Thomas Kim S, Stuart Beth, O'Leary Caroline J, Schmitt Jochen, Paul Carle, Williams Hywel C, Langan Sinead

机构信息

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 21;10(4):e0124770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124770. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atopic eczema (AE) is a chronic disease with flares and remissions. Long-term control of AE flares has been identified as a core outcome domain for AE trials. However, it is unclear how flares should be defined and measured.

OBJECTIVE

To validate two concepts of AE flares based on daily reports of topical medication use: (i) escalation of treatment and (ii) days of topical anti-inflammatory medication use (topical corticosteroids and/or calcineurin inhibitors).

METHODS

Data from two published AE studies (studies A (n=336) and B (n=60)) were analysed separately. Validity and feasibility of flare definitions were assessed using daily global bother (scale 0 to 10) as the reference standard. Intra-class correlations were reported for continuous variables, and odds ratios and area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for binary outcome measures.

RESULTS

Good agreement was found between both AE flare definitions and change in global bother: area under the ROC curve for treatment escalation of 0.70 and 0.73 in studies A and B respectively, and area under the ROC curve of 0.69 for topical anti-inflammatory medication use (Study A only). Significant positive relationships were found between validated severity scales (POEM, SASSAD, TIS) and the duration of AE flares occurring in the previous week - POEM and SASSAD rose by half a point for each unit increase in number of days in flare. Smaller increases were observed on the TIS scale. Completeness of daily diaries was 95% for Study A and 60% for Study B over 16 weeks).

CONCLUSION

Both definitions were good proxy indicators of AE flares. We found no evidence that 'escalation of treatment' was a better measure of AE flares than 'use of topical anti-inflammatory medications'. Capturing disease flares in AE trials through daily recording of medication use is feasible and appears to be a good indicator of long-term control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN71423189 (Study A).

摘要

背景

特应性皮炎(AE)是一种有发作和缓解期的慢性疾病。AE试验的一个核心结局领域已被确定为对AE发作进行长期控制。然而,目前尚不清楚发作应如何定义和测量。

目的

基于局部用药的每日报告来验证AE发作的两个概念:(i)治疗升级;(ii)局部抗炎药物(局部用糖皮质激素和/或钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂)使用天数。

方法

分别分析了两项已发表的AE研究(研究A(n = 336)和研究B(n = 60))的数据。使用每日总体困扰程度(0至10分)作为参考标准,评估发作定义的有效性和可行性。报告连续变量的组内相关性,以及二元结局指标的比值比和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积。

结果

两种AE发作定义与总体困扰程度的变化之间均存在良好的一致性:研究A和研究B中治疗升级的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.70和0.73,局部抗炎药物使用的ROC曲线下面积为0.69(仅研究A)。在经过验证的严重程度量表(POEM、SASSAD、TIS)与前一周发生的AE发作持续时间之间发现显著的正相关关系——发作天数每增加一个单位,POEM和SASSAD升高0.5分。在TIS量表上观察到的升高幅度较小。研究A在16周内的每日日记完整性为95%,研究B为60%。

结论

两种定义都是AE发作的良好替代指标。我们没有发现证据表明“治疗升级”比“局部抗炎药物的使用”是更好的AE发作衡量指标。通过每日记录用药情况在AE试验中捕捉疾病发作是可行的,并且似乎是长期控制的良好指标。

试验注册

当前对照试验ISRCTN71423189(研究A)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbdb/4405584/c8b14fb34c24/pone.0124770.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验