Gumport Nicole B, Williams Joseph J, Harvey Allison G
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, 3210 Tolman Hall #1650, Berkeley, CA, 94720-1650, USA.
Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;48:164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
Progress toward establishing treatments for mental disorders has been good, particularly for cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). However, there is considerable room for improvement. The goal of this study was to begin the process of investigating the potential for improving treatment outcome via improving our understanding of learning processes.
Individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder (N = 20) participated in three computer-delivered CBT lessons for depression. Indices of learning were taken after each lesson, during three phone calls over the week following the lesson, and one week later. These were: (a) whether the participant thought about the lesson, (b) whether the participant applied the lesson, and (c) whether the participant generalized the lesson. Based on a predetermined list of therapy points (i.e., distinct ideas and principles), all participant responses were coded for the number of therapy points they thought about, applied, or generalized following each lesson.
Less than half of the thoughts and applications were accurate. Generalization, but not thoughts nor application, was associated with improved depression scores one week later.
The follow up period was only one week later and there was no comparison group so we cannot speak to the long term outcome of these measures or generalize to other mental disorders.
These results point to the importance of improving transfer of learning in CBT and represent a promising first step toward the development of methods to study and optimize learning of CBT so as to improve patient outcomes.
在确立精神障碍治疗方法方面已取得良好进展,尤其是认知行为疗法(CBT)。然而,仍有很大的改进空间。本研究的目的是通过增进我们对学习过程的理解,开始探索改善治疗效果的可能性。
被诊断为重度抑郁症的个体(N = 20)参加了三次计算机辅助的抑郁症认知行为疗法课程。在每次课程结束后、课程结束后的一周内通过三次电话随访以及一周后,收集学习指标。这些指标包括:(a)参与者是否思考了课程内容,(b)参与者是否应用了课程内容,以及(c)参与者是否将课程内容进行了推广。根据预先确定的治疗要点列表(即不同的观点和原则),对所有参与者在每次课程后思考、应用或推广的治疗要点数量进行编码。
不到一半的思考和应用是准确的。只有推广,而非思考或应用,与一周后的抑郁评分改善相关。
随访期仅为一周后,且没有对照组,因此我们无法说明这些措施的长期效果,也不能推广到其他精神障碍。
这些结果表明在认知行为疗法中改善学习迁移的重要性,并且代表了朝着开发研究和优化认知行为疗法学习方法以改善患者治疗效果迈出的有前景的第一步。