Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):233-9. doi: 10.1037/a0017678.
Numerous learning studies have shown that if the period of time devoted to studying information (e.g., casa-house) includes at least 1 test (casa-?), performance on a final test is improved-a finding known as the testing effect. In most of these studies, however, the final test is identical to the initial test. If the final test requires a novel demonstration of learning (i.e., transfer), prior studies suggest that a greater degree of transfer reduces the size of the testing effect. The authors tested this conjecture. In 2 experiments, 4th- or 5th-grade students learned to assign regions or cities to map locations and returned 1 day later for 2 kinds of final tests. One final test required exactly the same task seen during the learning session, and the other final test consisted of novel, more challenging questions. In both experiments, testing effects were found for both kinds of final tests, and the testing effect was no smaller, and actually slightly larger, for the final test requiring transfer. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).
大量的学习研究表明,如果用于研究信息(例如,casa-房子)的时间段至少包括 1 次测试(casa-?),那么最终测试的表现将会提高——这一发现被称为测试效应。然而,在这些研究中的大多数中,最终测试与初始测试相同。如果最终测试需要学习的新演示(即转移),那么之前的研究表明,更大程度的转移会减小测试效应的大小。作者对此假设进行了检验。在 2 项实验中,4 年级或 5 年级的学生学习将地区或城市分配给地图位置,然后在 1 天后进行 2 种最终测试。一种最终测试要求与学习期间看到的完全相同的任务,而另一种最终测试则由新颖、更具挑战性的问题组成。在这两项实验中,对于这两种最终测试都发现了测试效应,而对于需要转移的最终测试,测试效应并没有更小,实际上略大。(心理学文献数据库记录(c)2009 APA,保留所有权利)。