Assouline Sarit, Buccheri Valeria, Delmer Alain, Gaidano Gianluca, McIntyre Christine, Brewster Michael, Catalani Olivier, Hourcade-Potelleret Florence, Sayyed Pakeeza, Badoux Xavier
Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
Hematology Division, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Săo Paulo, Săo Paulo, Brazil.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Nov;80(5):1001-9. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12662. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
The aim of the phase Ib, two part SAWYER study (BO25341; NCT01292603) was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous (s.c.) rituximab compared with intravenous (i.v.) rituximab, both in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC), as first line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).
During part 1 (dose-finding), CLL patients received rituximab i.v. followed by a single dose of rituximab s.c. at one of three fixed doses (1400, 1600 or 1870 mg) in cycle 6. The primary objective was to identify a fixed s.c. dose that would achieve comparable rituximab serum trough concentrations (Ctrough ) to those achieved with the standard 4 weekly 500 mg m(-2) rituximab i.v. dose.
Fifty-five patients received a fixed dose of rituximab s.c., 16 received 1400 mg, 17 received 1600 mg and 22 received 1870 mg. The 1600 mg dose was predicted to achieve non-inferior Ctrough to standard rituximab i.v.
The rituximab s.c. safety profile was comparable with rituximab i.v., except that local administration-related reactions, mainly mild/moderate injection site reactions, occurred more frequently with rituximab s.c., which was not unexpected. Subcutaneous administration was preferred to i.v. administration by >90% of patients and nurses (n = 112).
SAWYER part 1 data predict that rituximab s.c. 1600 mg will achieve non-inferior Ctrough concentrations to rituximab i.v. 500 mg m(-2) , administered 4 weekly. This fixed s.c. dose is currently undergoing formal non-inferiority assessment in SAWYER part 2. In future, CLL treatment regimens comprising rituximab s.c. and oral FC could substantially reduce i.v. chair time.
Ib期两部分的SAWYER研究(BO25341;NCT01292603)旨在研究皮下注射利妥昔单抗与静脉注射利妥昔单抗联合氟达拉滨和环磷酰胺(FC)作为慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者一线治疗方案时的药代动力学和安全性。
在第1部分(剂量探索)中,CLL患者在第6周期接受静脉注射利妥昔单抗,随后在三个固定剂量(1400、1600或1870mg)之一皮下注射单剂量利妥昔单抗。主要目标是确定一个固定的皮下注射剂量,使其利妥昔单抗血清谷浓度(Ctrough)与标准的每4周静脉注射500mg/m(-2)利妥昔单抗剂量所达到的浓度相当。
55例患者接受了固定剂量的皮下注射利妥昔单抗,16例接受1400mg,17例接受1600mg,22例接受1870mg。预计1600mg剂量的Ctrough与标准静脉注射利妥昔单抗非劣效。
皮下注射利妥昔单抗的安全性与静脉注射利妥昔单抗相当,只是皮下注射利妥昔单抗时局部给药相关反应(主要是轻度/中度注射部位反应)更频繁发生,这在意料之中。超过90%的患者和护士(n = 112)更喜欢皮下给药而非静脉给药。
SAWYER第1部分数据预测,皮下注射1600mg利妥昔单抗的Ctrough浓度与每4周静脉注射500mg/m(-2)利妥昔单抗非劣效。这个固定的皮下注射剂量目前正在SAWYER第2部分进行正式的非劣效性评估。未来,包含皮下注射利妥昔单抗和口服FC的CLL治疗方案可大幅减少静脉注射时间。