Atia Mary A, Ramirez Francisco C, Gurudu Suryakanth R
Mary A Atia, Francisco C Ramirez, Suryakanth R Gurudu, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, United States.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Apr 16;7(4):328-35. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i4.328.
Colonoscopy is the gold standard test for colorectal cancer screening. The primary advantage of colonoscopy as opposed to other screening modalities is the ability to provide therapy by removal of precancerous lesions at the time of detection. However, colonoscopy may miss clinically important neoplastic polyps. The value of colonoscopy in reducing incidence of colorectal cancer is dependent on many factors including, the patient, provider, and facility level. A high quality examination includes adequate bowel preparation, optimal colonoscopy technique, meticulous inspection during withdrawal, identification of subtle flat lesions, and complete polypectomy. Considerable variation among institutions and endoscopists has been reported in the literature. In attempt to diminish this disparity, various approaches have been advocated to improve the quality of colonoscopy. The overall impact of these interventions is not yet well defined. Implementing optimal education and training and subsequently analyzing the impact of these endeavors in improvement of quality will be essential to augment the utility of colonoscopy for the prevention of colorectal cancer.
结肠镜检查是结直肠癌筛查的金标准测试。与其他筛查方式相比,结肠镜检查的主要优势在于能够在检测时通过切除癌前病变来提供治疗。然而,结肠镜检查可能会遗漏临床上重要的肿瘤性息肉。结肠镜检查在降低结直肠癌发病率方面的价值取决于许多因素,包括患者、提供者和机构水平。高质量的检查包括充分的肠道准备、最佳的结肠镜检查技术、退镜时的细致检查、识别细微的扁平病变以及完整的息肉切除术。文献报道机构和内镜医师之间存在相当大的差异。为了减少这种差异,人们提倡采用各种方法来提高结肠镜检查的质量。这些干预措施的总体影响尚未明确界定。实施最佳的教育和培训,随后分析这些努力对质量改善的影响,对于增强结肠镜检查在预防结直肠癌方面的效用至关重要。