Gao Fuqiang, Sun Wei, Li Zirong, Guo Wanshou, Kush Nepali, Ozaki Koji
Orthopedics. 2015 Apr;38(4):e263-70. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150402-53.
There is a need for an effective and noninvasive treatment for intractable bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip. Forty-six patients with intractable bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip were retrospectively studied to compare the short-term clinical effects of treatment with high-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs femoral head core decompression. The postoperative visual analog scale score decreased significantly more in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy group compared with the femoral head core decompression group (P<.05). For unilateral lesions, postoperative Harris Hip Scores for all hips in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy group were more significantly improved than Harris Hip Scores for all hips in the femoral head core decompression group (P<.05). Patients who underwent extracorporeal shock wave therapy also resumed daily activities significantly earlier. Average overall operative time was similar in both groups. Symptoms disappeared significantly sooner in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy group in patients with both unilateral (P<.01) and bilateral lesions (P<.05). Hospital costs were significantly lower with extracorporeal shock wave therapy compared with femoral head core decompression. The intraoperative fluoroscopy radiation dose was lower in extracorporeal shock wave therapy than in femoral head core decompression for both unilateral (P<.05) and bilateral lesions (P<.01). On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bone marrow edema improved in all patients during the follow-up period. After extracorporeal shock wave therapy, all patients remained pain-free and had normal findings on posttreatment radiographs and MRI scans. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy appears to be a valid, reliable, and noninvasive tool for rapidly resolving intractable bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip, and it has a low complication rate and relatively low cost compared with other conservative and surgical treatment approaches.
对于难治性髋关节骨髓水肿综合征,需要一种有效且无创的治疗方法。对46例难治性髋关节骨髓水肿综合征患者进行回顾性研究,以比较高能体外冲击波治疗与股骨头髓芯减压治疗的短期临床效果。与股骨头髓芯减压组相比,体外冲击波治疗组术后视觉模拟评分显著下降更多(P<0.05)。对于单侧病变,体外冲击波治疗组所有髋关节的术后Harris髋关节评分比股骨头髓芯减压组所有髋关节的Harris髋关节评分改善更显著(P<0.05)。接受体外冲击波治疗的患者也显著更早恢复日常活动。两组的平均总手术时间相似。单侧病变(P<0.01)和双侧病变(P<0.05)患者中,体外冲击波治疗组症状消失明显更快。与股骨头髓芯减压相比,体外冲击波治疗的住院费用显著更低。对于单侧病变(P<0.05)和双侧病变(P<0.01),体外冲击波治疗的术中透视辐射剂量低于股骨头髓芯减压。在磁共振成像(MRI)上,所有患者在随访期间骨髓水肿均有改善。体外冲击波治疗后,所有患者均无疼痛,治疗后的X线片和MRI扫描结果正常。体外冲击波治疗似乎是一种有效、可靠且无创的工具,可快速解决难治性髋关节骨髓水肿综合征,与其他保守和手术治疗方法相比,其并发症发生率低且成本相对较低。