Flint Adrian
School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies (SPAIS), University of Bristol, 11 Priory Road, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Apr 20;12(4):4321-39. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120404321.
Traditional healing remains an important aspect of many people's engagement with healthcare and, in this, responses to the treatment of HIV/AIDS are no different. However, given the gravity of the global HIV/AIDS pandemic, there has been much debate as to the value of traditional healing in this respect. Accordingly, this paper explores the extent to which meaningful accommodation between the biomedical and traditional sectors is possible (and/or even desirable). It does this through a consideration of Native American and South African experiences, looking at how the respective groups, in which medical pluralism is common, have addressed the issue of HIV/AIDS. The paper points to the importance of developing "culturally appropriate" forms of treatment that emphasise complementary rather than adversarial engagement between the traditional and biomedical systems and how policymakers can best facilitate this.
传统疗法仍然是许多人参与医疗保健的一个重要方面,在这方面,对艾滋病毒/艾滋病治疗的反应也不例外。然而,鉴于全球艾滋病毒/艾滋病大流行的严重性,关于传统疗法在这方面的价值一直存在很多争论。因此,本文探讨了生物医学和传统医学领域之间在多大程度上能够(和/或甚至应该)实现有意义的协调。本文通过考察美国原住民和南非的经验来进行探讨,研究在医疗多元主义普遍存在的各自群体中,是如何应对艾滋病毒/艾滋病问题的。本文指出了开发“文化上合适”的治疗形式的重要性,这种治疗形式强调传统医学和生物医学系统之间的互补而非对抗关系,以及政策制定者如何才能最好地促进这一点。