Brondi Sonia, Sarrica Mauro, Caramis Alessandro, Piccolo Chiara, Mazzara Bruno M
Sapienza University of Rome, ItalyItalian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT), ItalyUniversity of Padua, ItalySapienza University of Rome, Italy
Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Aug;25(6):737-53. doi: 10.1177/0963662515580067. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
Public engagement is considered a crucial process in the transition towards sustainable energy systems. However, less space has been devoted to understand how policy makers and stakeholders view citizens and their relationship with energy issues. Nonetheless, together with technological advancements, policies and political debates on energy affect public engagement as well as individual practices. This article aims at tackling this issue by exploring how policy makers and stakeholders have socially constructed sustainable energy in Italian parliamentary debates and consultations during recent years (2009-2012). Results show that societal discourses on sustainable energy are oriented in a manner that precludes public engagement. The political debate is characterised by argumentative 'short-circuits' that constrain individual and community actions to the acceptance or the refusal of top-down decisions and that leave little room for community empowerment and bottom-up innovation.
公众参与被视为向可持续能源系统转型的关键过程。然而,对于理解政策制定者和利益相关者如何看待公民及其与能源问题的关系,却鲜有关注。尽管如此,随着技术进步,关于能源的政策和政治辩论也会影响公众参与以及个人行为。本文旨在探讨近年来(2009 - 2012年)意大利议会辩论和磋商中,政策制定者和利益相关者如何在社会层面构建可持续能源,从而解决这一问题。结果表明,关于可持续能源的社会话语呈现出一种阻碍公众参与的倾向。政治辩论的特点是存在论证性的“短路”,将个人和社区行动限制在接受或拒绝自上而下的决策上,几乎没有给社区赋权和自下而上的创新留下空间。