Sánchez-Tabernero Gonzalo, Hidalgo-Muñoz Antonio R, Galán José Ignacio, Tabernero Carmen
Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Faculty of Psychology, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2023 May 23;14:1134499. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1134499. eCollection 2023.
The demographic growth and the development of the welfare system have been accompanied by an important social dilemma between preserving nature or promoting energy development by assuming the benefits and risks of both proposals. This research attempts to address this social dilemma by analyzing the psychosocial factors that influence the acceptance or rejection of a new uranium mining development and exploitation project. The main objective was to test an explanatory theoretical model of uranium mining project acceptance, based on the interrelation of sociodemographic variables (e.g., age, gender, economic and educational situation, and level of knowledge about uranium energy) and cognitive variables (e.g., environmental beliefs, risk, and benefit perceptions), along with the activation of an emotional balance in response to the proposal of constructing a uranium mine.
Three hundred seventy-one individuals responded to the questionnaire about the variables included in the model.
The results showed that older participants showed lower levels of agreement with the mining proposal people, while women and those with greater knowledge of nuclear energy perceived greater risks and had a more negative emotional balance. The proposed explanatory model based on sociodemographic, cognitive, and affective variables showed good fit indices for explaining the assessment of the uranium mine. Thus, age, level of knowledge, risks and benefits, and emotional balance had a direct effect on the acceptance of the mine. Likewise, emotional balance showed a partial mediation effect between the relationships existing between the perception of benefits and risks and the acceptance of the mining proposal.
The results are discussed based on the consideration of analyzing sociodemographic, cognitive, and affective variables to understand potential conflicts in communities affected by energy projects.
人口增长和福利体系的发展伴随着一个重要的社会困境,即在保护自然与通过承担两种提议的益处和风险来促进能源发展之间做出抉择。本研究试图通过分析影响对新铀矿开采与开发项目接受或拒绝的社会心理因素来解决这一社会困境。主要目标是基于社会人口统计学变量(如年龄、性别、经济和教育状况以及对铀能源的了解程度)和认知变量(如环境信念、风险和益处认知)之间的相互关系,以及对建设铀矿提议的情感平衡反应,来检验一个铀矿开采项目接受度的解释性理论模型。
371人对关于模型中所包含变量的问卷做出了回应。
结果表明,年龄较大的参与者对采矿提议的认同程度较低,而女性和对核能了解较多的人感知到更大的风险且情感平衡更为消极。基于社会人口统计学、认知和情感变量提出的解释性模型在解释对铀矿的评估方面显示出良好的拟合指数。因此,年龄、知识水平、风险与益处以及情感平衡对铀矿的接受度有直接影响。同样,情感平衡在益处与风险感知和采矿提议接受度之间的现有关系中显示出部分中介效应。
基于对社会人口统计学、认知和情感变量的分析来理解受能源项目影响的社区中潜在冲突的考量,对结果进行了讨论。