Mennicke Annelise, Anderson Delaney, Oehme Karen, Kennedy Stephanie
Violence Vict. 2014;29(5):814-27. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-13-00017.
In a study to assess law enforcement officers' perceptions of rape and rape victims, researchers asked 149 law enforcement officers to respond to surveys which included a definition of rape measure, an unfounded rape claims measure, and the Rape Myth Acceptance Scale-Revised (RMA-R) measure. Although most officers scored low on the RMA-R--indicating that they did not adhere to myths about rape--most officers also responded with incomplete definitions of rape and inaccurate estimates of the number of false rape claims. Multivariate analyses indicated that officers' open-ended responses did not predict their scores on the RMA-R scale. It is argued that the RMA-R alone does not accurately measure officers' understanding of rape. Officers need ongoing training on the legal elements of the crime, the necessity of sensitivity with victims, and research-based statistics on the prevalence of rape.
在一项评估执法人员对强奸及强奸受害者看法的研究中,研究人员让149名执法人员回答调查问卷,其中包括一项强奸定义测量、一项无根据强奸指控测量以及修订后的强奸谬见接受量表(RMA-R)测量。尽管大多数执法人员在RMA-R上得分较低——表明他们不认同关于强奸的谬见——但大多数执法人员对强奸的定义回答不完整,对虚假强奸指控数量的估计也不准确。多变量分析表明,执法人员的开放式回答并不能预测他们在RMA-R量表上的得分。有人认为,仅靠RMA-R并不能准确衡量执法人员对强奸的理解。执法人员需要接受关于该罪行法律要素、对受害者保持敏感的必要性以及基于研究的强奸发生率统计数据的持续培训。