Suppr超能文献

神经性疼痛问卷在灼口综合征患者中的应用。

The application of neuropathic pain questionnaires in burning mouth syndrome patients.

出版信息

J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2015 Spring;29(2):177-82. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1326.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate and compare the validity of the PainDETECT, DN4, and abbreviated DN4 (DN4i) neuropathic pain questionnaires for primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), which is a burning sensation in the oral mucosa in the absence of any identifiable organic etiology.

METHODS

Eighty-one patients (42 with primary BMS and 39 with nociceptive pain) complaining of a burning sensation and pain in their oral mucosa were enrolled in this study. All of the patients completed the neuropathic pain questionnaires. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were estimated. Then the relationship between pain intensity and total neuropathic pain score was investigated. Data were analyzed with the chi-square test and independent t test for subjects' baseline characteristic differences, and with Pearson correlation coefficients for the relationship of variables.

RESULTS

The mean area under the ROC curves (AUCs) for PainDETECT, DN4, and DN4i were 0.81, 0.79, and 0.81, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the AUCs among the questionnaires. PainDETECT, DN4, and DN4i had a lower sensitivity and specificity for BMS compared to previous validation studies. The total scores for PainDETECT, DN4, and DN4i in the primary BMS group were significantly associated with pain intensity.

CONCLUSION

Although the results of this study suggest that neuropathic pain questionnaires, such as PainDETECT and DN4, are not ideal principal screening tools for BMS patients, a substantial proportion of neuropathic symptoms in primary BMS patients were identified.

摘要

目的

评估和比较 PainDETECT、DN4 和简化版 DN4(DN4i)三种神经性疼痛问卷在原发性灼口综合征(BMS)中的有效性,BMS 是一种口腔黏膜烧灼感,无任何可识别的器质性病因。

方法

本研究纳入了 81 名(42 名原发性 BMS 患者和 39 名伤害感受性疼痛患者)抱怨口腔黏膜烧灼感和疼痛的患者。所有患者均完成了神经性疼痛问卷。评估了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积。然后,研究了疼痛强度与总神经性疼痛评分之间的关系。采用卡方检验和独立 t 检验分析受试者基线特征差异,采用 Pearson 相关系数分析变量之间的关系。

结果

PainDETECT、DN4 和 DN4i 的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)均值分别为 0.81、0.79 和 0.81。问卷的 AUC 之间没有统计学差异。与先前的验证研究相比,PainDETECT、DN4 和 DN4i 对 BMS 的敏感性和特异性较低。原发性 BMS 组的 PainDETECT、DN4 和 DN4i 总分与疼痛强度显著相关。

结论

尽管本研究结果表明,神经性疼痛问卷(如 PainDETECT 和 DN4)不是 BMS 患者的理想主要筛查工具,但原发性 BMS 患者中存在相当比例的神经性症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验