Sato Boku Aiji, Kimura Hiroyuki, Tokura Tatsuya, Umemura Eri, Miyauchi Tomoya, Ito Mikiko, Kishi Shinichi, Ogi Nobumi, Tonoike Takashi, Ozaki Norio, Nakano Yumi, Okuda Masahiro
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University, Japan.
Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
J Dent Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Various questionnaires have been validated as methods for screening of neuropathic pain, but none have been established for the orofacial region. Although chronic pain and depression are likely to comorbid, few studies have examined the relationship between orofacial chronic pain and depression. Therefore, we evaluated the potential of the Japanese Version of PainDETECT as an assessment tool for neuropathic pain associated with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) and persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP). We also evaluated the depression scale such as Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI: a subjective index) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS: an objective index) with BMS or PIFP.
As a target, we administered the Japanese version of the PainDETECT questionnaire to the BMS (29 patients) and PIFP (17 patients). As a control, patients with post-extraction pain (typical nociceptive pain, (EXT) 16 patients) were also participated. We performed BDI and HDRS with BMS or PIFP.
Although PainDETECT final score was significantly higher in BMS [median: 10] compared with PIFP [6] and EXT [5] (p < 0.05), PainDETECT final scores for all groups were lower than the cutoff value for the possibility of neuropathic pain. HDRS was significantly higher in the BMS than the PIFP. There were no significant differences between the BMS and PIFP in BDI.
Under the limitations of current research design, the Japanese version of the PainDETECT questionnaire does not show sufficient potential as pain assessment tool for patients with BMS and PIFP. BMS is comorbid with depression objectively when compared with PIFP.
背景/目的:各种问卷已被验证可作为筛查神经性疼痛的方法,但尚未有针对口面部区域的问卷。尽管慢性疼痛和抑郁症可能并发,但很少有研究探讨口面部慢性疼痛与抑郁症之间的关系。因此,我们评估了日语版疼痛检测问卷(PainDETECT)作为灼口综合征(BMS)和持续性特发性面部疼痛(PIFP)相关神经性疼痛评估工具的潜力。我们还使用贝克抑郁量表(BDI:主观指标)和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS:客观指标)对BMS或PIFP患者进行了抑郁评估。
我们将日语版的PainDETECT问卷施用于BMS患者(29例)和PIFP患者(17例)。作为对照,拔牙后疼痛患者(典型的伤害性疼痛,(EXT)16例)也参与了研究。我们对BMS或PIFP患者进行了BDI和HDRS评估。
尽管BMS患者的PainDETECT最终得分[中位数:10]显著高于PIFP患者[6]和EXT患者[5](p<0.05),但所有组的PainDETECT最终得分均低于神经性疼痛可能性的临界值。BMS患者的HDRS得分显著高于PIFP患者。BMS和PIFP患者在BDI上无显著差异。
在当前研究设计的局限性下,日语版的PainDETECT问卷作为BMS和PIFP患者的疼痛评估工具未显示出足够的潜力。与PIFP相比,BMS在客观上与抑郁症并发。