Suppr超能文献

头颈部游离皮瓣重建患者的抗生素预防

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction.

作者信息

Mitchell Ryan M, Mendez Eduardo, Schmitt Nicole C, Bhrany Amit D, Futran Neal D

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Dec;141(12):1096-103. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.0513.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Evidence supports short courses of perioperative antibiotics for patients receiving minor head and neck procedures. Few studies have addressed antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of head and neck defects.

OBJECTIVE

To determine ideal antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of 427 adults receiving free flap reconstruction of head and neck defects at 2 affiliated tertiary care academic hospitals between January 1, 2006, and January 28, 2013.

EXPOSURES

Prophylactic antibiotic type and duration were recorded from patient records.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcome data were abstracted from patients' medical records including infection at the surgical sites and distant nonsurgical sites and flap site complications including flap compromise, dehiscence, or fistula. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the association of risk factors with the primary outcome of any infection within 30 days of surgery.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients (22.5%) received prophylactic antibiotics for 24 hours or less, and 331 patients received prolonged courses of prophylactic antibiotics. The majority of patients received ampicillin-sulbactam alone for prophylaxis (53.2%), while 36.5% received clindamycin alone and 10.3% received an alternative regimen. Postoperative infections occurred in 46% of patients, and 22% of patients had an infection at the flap inset site or neck incision. The use of clindamycin (odds ratio [OR], 2.54; 95% CI, 1.25-5.14 [P = .01]) was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection; extended duration of antibiotics (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.34-1.19 [P = .18]) was not associated with increased risk of postoperative infection. By multivariate analysis, use of clindamycin (OR, 6.71; 95% CI, 1.83-24.60 [P = .004]) and oral tobacco use (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.39 [P = .02]), but not extended course of prophylactic antibiotics (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.30-1.86 [P = .53]), were associated with a higher risk of postoperative flap or neck infections.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The choice of antibiotic appears to affect the rate of all postoperative infections and flap site infections more than the duration of antibiotics following head and neck free flap reconstruction. At our institutions, ampicillin-sulbactam is the preferred prophylactic antibiotic for major clean-contaminated head and neck procedures when possible.

摘要

重要性

有证据支持为接受小型头颈部手术的患者采用短期围手术期抗生素治疗。很少有研究探讨对头颈部缺损进行游离皮瓣重建患者的抗生素预防问题。

目的

确定接受头颈部游离皮瓣重建患者的理想抗生素预防方案。

设计、地点和参与者:对2006年1月1日至2013年1月28日期间在2家附属三级医疗学术医院接受头颈部缺损游离皮瓣重建的427名成年人进行回顾性队列研究。

暴露因素

从患者记录中记录预防性抗生素的类型和持续时间。

主要结局和测量指标

结局数据从患者病历中提取,包括手术部位和远处非手术部位的感染以及皮瓣部位并发症,如皮瓣受损、裂开或瘘管。采用多因素逻辑回归分析确定危险因素与术后30天内任何感染这一主要结局之间的关联。

结果

96名患者(22.5%)接受预防性抗生素治疗24小时或更短时间,331名患者接受延长疗程的预防性抗生素治疗。大多数患者单独使用氨苄西林-舒巴坦进行预防(53.2%),而36.5%的患者单独使用克林霉素,10.3%的患者接受替代方案。46%的患者发生术后感染,22%的患者在皮瓣植入部位或颈部切口处发生感染。使用克林霉素(比值比[OR],2.54;95%置信区间,1.25 - 5.14[P = 0.01])与术后感染风险增加相关;抗生素延长使用时间(OR,0.63;95%置信区间,0.34 - 1.19[P = 0.18])与术后感染风险增加无关。通过多因素分析,使用克林霉素(OR,6.71;95%置信区间,1.83 - 24.60[P = 0.004])和使用口服烟草(OR,1.20;95%置信区间,1.04 - 1.39[P = 0.02]),而非预防性抗生素延长疗程(OR,0.75;95%置信区间,0.30 - 1.86[P = 0.53]),与术后皮瓣或颈部感染风险较高相关。

结论与意义

头颈部游离皮瓣重建后,抗生素的选择似乎比抗生素使用时间对所有术后感染率和皮瓣部位感染率的影响更大。在我们的机构中,氨苄西林-舒巴坦在可能的情况下是大型清洁-污染性头颈部手术的首选预防性抗生素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验