Burke Robert E, Juarez-Colunga Elizabeth, Levy Cari, Prochazka Allan V, Coleman Eric A, Ginde Adit A
*Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Eastern Colorado Health Care System †Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver ‡Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Public Health §Division of Health Care Policy and Research ∥Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Med Care. 2015 Jun;53(6):492-500. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000359.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The number of patients discharged to postacute care (PAC) facilities after hospitalization increased by 50% nationally between 1996 and 2010. We sought to describe payors and patients most affected by this trend and to identify diagnoses for which PAC facility care may be substituting for continued hospital care.
Retrospective analysis of the National Hospital Discharge Survey from 1996 to 2010.
Adult discharges from a national sample of non-Federal hospitals.
PARTICIPANTS/EXPOSURES: Adults admitted and discharged to a PAC facility between 1996 and 2010. Our analysis includes 2.99 million sampled discharges, representative of 386 million discharges nationally.
Patient demographic and hospitalization characteristics, including length of stay (LOS) and diagnoses treated.
More than half (50.7%) of all patients discharged to PAC facilities were 80 years old or older in 2010; 40% of hospitalizations in this age group ended with a PAC stay. Decreases in LOS and increases in PAC facility use were consistent across payors and patient demographics. PAC facilities may be substituting for continued inpatient care for patients with pneumonia, hip fracture, and sepsis as these diagnoses demonstrated the clearest trends of decreasing LOS and increasing discharges to PAC facilities.
The rise in discharges to PAC facilities is occurring in all age groups and payors, though the predominant population is the very old Medicare patient, for whom successful rehabilitation may be most unsure. PAC facility care may be increasingly substituted for prolonged hospitalizations for patients with pneumonia, hip fracture, and sepsis.
背景/目的:1996年至2010年间,全国范围内住院后被转至急性后期护理(PAC)机构的患者数量增加了50%。我们试图描述受这一趋势影响最大的付款方和患者,并确定哪些诊断的患者可能正由PAC机构护理替代持续的医院护理。
对1996年至2010年全国医院出院调查进行回顾性分析。
来自全国非联邦医院样本的成人出院病例。
参与者/暴露因素:1996年至2010年间入住并出院至PAC机构的成年人。我们的分析包括299万例抽样出院病例,代表全国3.86亿例出院病例。
患者人口统计学和住院特征,包括住院时长(LOS)和治疗的诊断。
2010年,所有转至PAC机构的患者中,超过一半(50.7%)年龄在80岁及以上;该年龄组40%的住院治疗以入住PAC机构结束。各付款方和患者人口统计学特征的住院时长均有所下降,PAC机构的使用则有所增加。PAC机构可能正在替代肺炎、髋部骨折和败血症患者的持续住院护理,因为这些诊断显示出住院时长下降和转至PAC机构的出院人数增加的最明显趋势。
转至PAC机构的出院人数增加现象在所有年龄组和付款方中均有发生,尽管主要人群是老年医疗保险患者,对他们而言,成功康复可能最不确定。对于肺炎、髋部骨折和败血症患者,PAC机构护理可能越来越多地替代延长的住院治疗。