Haanstra Tsjitske M, Kamper Steven J, Williams Christopher M, Spriensma Alette S, Lin Chung-Wei Christine, Maher Christopher G, de Vet Henrica C W, Ostelo Raymond W J G
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Musculoskeletal Division, George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia School of Medicine and Public Health, Hunter Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pain. 2015 Aug;156(8):1530-1536. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000198.
It is believed that patients' expectancies about the effectiveness of treatment influence their treatment outcomes, but the working mechanism is rarely studied in patients with low back pain. Theoretical models suggest that adherence to treatment may be an important pathway. The aim of this study was to assess the mediating role of adherence to treatment in the relationship between expectancies and the outcomes of recovery and pain intensity in patients with acute low back pain. This study used data from a randomized placebo-controlled trial of paracetamol for acute low back pain. Expectancies were measured with the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire. Adherence was measured with a medication diary. Pain intensity was recorded daily in a diary on a 0 to 10 pain scale, and recovery was defined as the first of 7 consecutive days scoring 0 or 1 on a 6-point pain scale. Cox regression (dependent variable: recovery) and linear mixed-model analyses (dependent variable: daily pain intensity scores) were performed. The "difference in coefficients" approach was used to establish mediation. A total of 1573 participants were included in current analyses. There was a small but highly significant relationship between expectancies and outcomes; 3.3% of the relationship between expectancies and recovery and 14.2% of the relationship between expectancies and pain intensity were mediated by adherence to treatment. This study does not convincingly support the theory that adherence is a key pathway in the relationship between treatment outcome expectancies and recovery and pain intensity in this acute low back pain population.
人们认为,患者对治疗效果的期望会影响其治疗结果,但在腰痛患者中,其作用机制鲜少被研究。理论模型表明,坚持治疗可能是一条重要途径。本研究旨在评估坚持治疗在急性腰痛患者的期望与恢复结果及疼痛强度之间关系中的中介作用。本研究使用了对乙酰氨基酚治疗急性腰痛的随机安慰剂对照试验的数据。期望用可信度期望问卷进行测量。坚持治疗情况用用药日记进行测量。疼痛强度通过日记每天记录在0至10的疼痛量表上,恢复定义为连续7天中首次在6分疼痛量表上得分为0或1。进行了Cox回归(因变量:恢复)和线性混合模型分析(因变量:每日疼痛强度评分)。采用“系数差异”方法来确定中介作用。当前分析共纳入1573名参与者。期望与结果之间存在微小但高度显著的关系;期望与恢复之间关系的3.3%以及期望与疼痛强度之间关系的14.2%是由坚持治疗介导的。本研究并未令人信服地支持以下理论,即坚持治疗是该急性腰痛人群中治疗结果期望与恢复及疼痛强度之间关系的关键途径。