Achterberg Sefanja, Kappelle L Jaap, de Bakker Paul I W, Traylor Matthew, Algra Ale
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Utrecht Stroke Center, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 23;10(4):e0119203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119203. eCollection 2015.
Patients who have suffered from cerebral ischemia have a high risk of recurrent vascular events. Predictive models based on classical risk factors typically have limited prognostic value. Given that cerebral ischemia has a heritable component, genetic information might improve performance of these risk models. Our aim was to develop and compare two models: one containing traditional vascular risk factors, the other also including genetic information.
We studied 1020 patients with cerebral ischemia and genotyped them with the Illumina Immunochip. Median follow-up time was 6.5 years; the annual incidence of new ischemic events (primary outcome, n=198) was 3.0%. The prognostic model based on classical vascular risk factors had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.69). When we added a genetic risk score based on prioritized SNPs from a genome-wide association study of ischemic stroke (using summary statistics from the METASTROKE study which included 12389 cases and 62004 controls), the AUC-ROC remained the same. Similar results were found for the secondary outcome ischemic stroke.
We found no additional value of genetic information in a prognostic model for the risk of ischemic events in patients with cerebral ischemia of arterial origin. This is consistent with a complex, polygenic architecture, where many genes of weak effect likely act in concert to influence the heritable risk of an individual to develop (recurrent) vascular events. At present, genetic information cannot help clinicians to distinguish patients at high risk for recurrent vascular events.
脑缺血患者发生血管事件复发的风险很高。基于经典危险因素的预测模型通常预后价值有限。鉴于脑缺血具有遗传成分,遗传信息可能会提高这些风险模型的性能。我们的目的是开发并比较两种模型:一种包含传统血管危险因素,另一种还包括遗传信息。
我们研究了1020例脑缺血患者,并使用Illumina免疫芯片对他们进行基因分型。中位随访时间为6.5年;新缺血事件(主要结局,n = 198)的年发生率为3.0%。基于经典血管危险因素的预后模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)为0.65(95%置信区间0.61-0.69)。当我们加入基于缺血性卒中全基因组关联研究中优先选择的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的遗传风险评分时(使用来自METASTROKE研究的汇总统计数据,该研究包括12389例病例和62004例对照),AUC-ROC保持不变。对于次要结局缺血性卒中也发现了类似结果。
我们发现遗传信息在动脉源性脑缺血患者缺血事件风险的预后模型中没有额外价值。这与复杂的多基因结构一致,其中许多弱效应基因可能共同作用以影响个体发生(复发性)血管事件的遗传风险。目前,遗传信息无法帮助临床医生区分复发性血管事件高危患者。