Suppr超能文献

拉丁裔皮肤的激光换肤术:665例病例的经验

Laser Resurfacing for Latin Skins: The Experience with 665 Cases.

作者信息

Triana Lina, Cuadros S César, Triana Carlos, Barbato Carlos, Zambrano Marco

机构信息

Corpus and Rostrum Surgery Center, Cali, Colombia,

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;39(4):582-8. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0489-5. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

CO2 resurfacing and CO2 microfractionated laser systems are reliable tools to improve different facial pathologic skin conditions but are associated with a high rate of complications specially in Fitzpatrick III, IV, and V skin phototypes, predominant in the Latin population, which has pushed many surgeons to change technologies and abandon its use.

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient results with the CO2 resurfacing laser and microfractionated CO2 laser resurfacing in all skin types and show similar results to those obtained worldwide in patients with phototypes III, IV, and V.

METHODS

Standardized review of medical records from a database of private practice patients treated since January 1998 to July 2012 with SlimE30 MiXto SX(®) CO2 laser. Evaluation of outcomes, complications, and satisfaction of three different modalities of treatment (CO2 ablative laser, CO2 microfractionated and a combination of both) was made.

RESULTS

A total of 665 treated patients were included. Ablative CO2 was applied to 80.3 %, CO2 microfractionated to 15.1 %, and mixed treatment to 4.5 % of cases. Globally, hyperpigmentation rates were 30.4 % in the CO2 resurfacing group, 16.3 % when a combination of modalities was applied and 11 % in microfractionated CO2 cases. A steady increase of these rates is shown as the phototype becomes higher. Satisfaction rates were high for all groups: 86.7 % in the mixed group, 82.2 % in the microfractionated CO2, and 79.6 % in the CO2 ablative.

CONCLUSIONS

Good results and an acceptable rate of complications in latin skins are obtainable after treating patients with CO2 ablative and microfractionated CO2 systems alone or in combination. Staged treatments and adequate post-procedure care reduce these complications.

摘要

背景

二氧化碳磨皮和二氧化碳微剥脱激光系统是改善不同面部病理性皮肤状况的可靠工具,但并发症发生率较高,特别是在 Fitzpatrick III、IV 和 V 型皮肤光类型中,这在拉丁人群中占主导地位,这促使许多外科医生改变技术并放弃使用。

目的

比较所有皮肤类型使用二氧化碳磨皮激光和微剥脱二氧化碳激光磨皮的患者结果,并显示与全球范围内 III、IV 和 V 型光类型患者获得的结果相似。

方法

对自 1998 年 1 月至 2012 年 7 月使用 SlimE30 MiXto SX(®) 二氧化碳激光治疗的私人执业患者数据库中的病历进行标准化审查。对三种不同治疗方式(二氧化碳剥脱激光、二氧化碳微剥脱以及两者结合)的结果、并发症和满意度进行评估。

结果

共纳入 665 例接受治疗的患者。80.3% 的病例应用了剥脱性二氧化碳激光,15.1% 应用了二氧化碳微剥脱,4.5% 应用了联合治疗。总体而言,二氧化碳磨皮组的色素沉着率为 30.4%,联合治疗方式时为 16.3%,二氧化碳微剥脱病例中为 11%。随着光类型升高,这些比率呈稳步上升趋势。所有组的满意度都很高:联合组为 86.7%,二氧化碳微剥脱组为 82.2%,二氧化碳剥脱组为 79.6%。

结论

单独或联合使用二氧化碳剥脱和二氧化碳微剥脱系统治疗拉丁裔皮肤患者后,可获得良好的效果和可接受的并发症发生率。分阶段治疗和适当的术后护理可减少这些并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验