David Guy, Lim Sangtaeck, Gunnarsson Candace, Kocharian Richard, Roy Sanjoy
a a The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA , USA.
J Med Econ. 2015;18(9):735-45. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1044994. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
SURGIFLO and FLOSEAL are absorbable gelatin-based products that form hemostatic matrices. These products are indicated as adjuncts to hemostasis when control of bleeding by conventional surgical techniques (such as suture, ligature or cautery) is ineffective or impractical. This study analyzed the effect of surgery time and the choice of product on cost to the hospital and patient outcomes.
The data source was the Premier Hospital database from January 1, 2010-June 30, 2012. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age with a spinal fusion or refusion surgery with either SURGIFLO (Ethicon Inc.) or FLOSEAL (Baxter International Inc.). The hospital Charge Master was used to identify the amount of flowable product, whether it included Thrombin, and the cost. Multivariable models were performed on overall cost and likelihood of surgical complications. All models were adjusted for patient demographics and severity as well as hospital, and surgical characteristics.
A total of 24,882 patient records from 121 hospitals were analysed, which included 15,088 FLOSEAL records and 9794 SURGIFLO records, with 1498 SURGIFLO with Thrombin patients. Little or no differences in surgical complications were found between surgeries with SURGIFLO vs. surgery with FLOSEAL. Regression models showed a reduction in cost of $65 associated with use of SURGIFLO with Thrombin and an additional $21 reduction in hospital cost for each additional hour of surgery. Modeling which accounts for hospital fixed effects suggest that, in addition to a gap of ∼$300 favoring SURGIFLO with Thrombin, every additional hour of surgery was associated with an additional reduction in hospital costs of ∼$26.
While the choice of flowable product had no effect on clinical outcomes, use of SURGIFLO was associated with hospital cost savings for flowable product. These savings increased with the length of surgery, even when controlling for the amount of flowable product (mL) used.
SURGIFLO和FLOSEAL是可吸收的明胶基产品,可形成止血基质。当通过传统手术技术(如缝合、结扎或烧灼)控制出血无效或不切实际时,这些产品可作为止血辅助剂。本研究分析了手术时间和产品选择对医院成本和患者预后的影响。
数据来源为2010年1月1日至2012年6月30日的Premier医院数据库。符合条件的患者年龄≥18岁,接受了使用SURGIFLO(爱惜康公司)或FLOSEAL(百特国际公司)进行的脊柱融合或翻修手术。利用医院收费主表确定可流动产品的用量、是否包含凝血酶以及成本。对总成本和手术并发症的可能性进行多变量模型分析。所有模型均根据患者人口统计学和严重程度以及医院和手术特征进行了调整。
共分析了来自121家医院的24882份患者记录,其中包括15088份FLOSEAL记录和9794份SURGIFLO记录,以及1498份使用含凝血酶SURGIFLO的患者记录。使用SURGIFLO的手术与使用FLOSEAL的手术在手术并发症方面几乎没有差异。回归模型显示,使用含凝血酶的SURGIFLO可使成本降低65美元,手术每增加一小时,医院成本还可额外降低21美元。考虑医院固定效应的模型表明,除了使用含凝血酶的SURGIFLO有近300美元的优势外,手术每增加一小时,医院成本还可额外降低约26美元。
虽然可流动产品的选择对临床结果没有影响,但使用SURGIFLO可节省医院在可流动产品方面的成本。即使控制了可流动产品的用量(毫升),这些节省也会随着手术时间的延长而增加。