• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放机器人辅助与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的比较结果

[Comparative results of open robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection].

作者信息

Kriger A G, Berelavichus S V, Smirnov A V, Gorin D S, Akhtanin E A

机构信息

Institut khirurgii im. A.V. Vishnevskogo Minzdrava RF, Moskva.

出版信息

Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2015(1):23-29. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia2015123-29.

DOI:10.17116/hirurgia2015123-29
PMID:25909547
Abstract

It was performed a retrospective analysis of the results of distal pancreatic resections (DPR) in 89 patients with different tumors. Conventional open operations were performed in 60 patients, robot-assisted - in 19 patients, laparoscopic - in 10 cases. Absolute indication for open surgery was pancreatic cancer T3-4 stages. Mini-invasive distal resections (robot-assisted and laparoscopic) were performed in cases of pancreatic cancer T1-2 stages, benign tumors and tumors with low potential of malignancy and diameter up to 4-5 cm. Results of robot-assisted and laparoscopic interventions are similar but robot-assisted technique provides more precise surgery. It improves quality of lymphadenectomy, decreases probability of intraoperative bleeding. Duration of robot-assisted and open operation did not differ significantly. Blood loss was significantly lower in group of robot-assisted method (mean 470 ml) while in cases of open and laparoscopic techniques this parameter was 1013.8 and 833.3 ml respectively. Postoperative complications in open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted groups developed in 45.1, 52.6 and 50% of observations respectively. Pancreatic fistulas were revealed in 58.8, 80 and 58.3% of cases respectively. There were not deaths after laparoscopic and robot-assisted pancreatic resections. 2 patients died after open surgery.

摘要

对89例患有不同肿瘤的患者进行了远端胰腺切除术(DPR)结果的回顾性分析。60例患者进行了传统开放手术,19例患者进行了机器人辅助手术,10例患者进行了腹腔镜手术。开放手术的绝对指征是胰腺癌T3 - 4期。对于胰腺癌T1 - 2期、良性肿瘤以及恶性潜能低且直径达4 - 5 cm的肿瘤,进行了微创远端切除术(机器人辅助和腹腔镜手术)。机器人辅助手术和腹腔镜手术的结果相似,但机器人辅助技术提供了更精确的手术。它提高了淋巴结清扫的质量,降低了术中出血的概率。机器人辅助手术和开放手术的持续时间无显著差异。机器人辅助手术组的失血量显著更低(平均470 ml),而开放手术和腹腔镜手术组这一参数分别为1013.8 ml和833.3 ml。开放手术组、腹腔镜手术组和机器人辅助手术组的术后并发症分别在45.1%、52.6%和50%的观察病例中出现。胰瘘分别在58.8%、80%和58.3%的病例中出现。腹腔镜和机器人辅助胰腺切除术后无死亡病例。2例患者在开放手术后死亡。

相似文献

1
[Comparative results of open robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection].开放机器人辅助与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的比较结果
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2015(1):23-29. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia2015123-29.
2
Multicenter comparative study of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy using propensity score-matching.使用倾向评分匹配法对腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术的多中心比较研究
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Oct;22(10):731-6. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.268. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
3
[Analysis of risk factors associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula after robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy].[机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术后胰瘘相关危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jul 1;62(7):677-684. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20240325-00144.
4
Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique.机器人辅助微创远端胰腺切除术优于腹腔镜技术。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):128-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825fff08.
5
Security and Radical Assessment in Open, Laparoscopic, Robotic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study.开放、腹腔镜及机器人辅助结直肠癌手术中的安全性与根治性评估:一项对比研究
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan 1;17:1533033818794160. doi: 10.1177/1533033818794160.
6
Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.机器人辅助微创(杂交腹腔镜和机器人)胰十二指肠切除术的围手术期和肿瘤学结果:基于胰瘘风险评分和癌症/分期匹配与开放胰十二指肠切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1675-1681. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07551-2. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
7
Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective propensity score-matched study.机器人与腹腔镜胰远端脾切除术治疗胰导管腺癌的短期和中期结果:回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jul;55:81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 May 23.
8
Robotic-Assisted Approach Improves Vessel Preservation in Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy.机器人辅助方法改善保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术中的血管保留
Dig Surg. 2016;33(5):406-13. doi: 10.1159/000444269. Epub 2016 May 4.
9
An 8-year single-center study: 170 cases of middle pancreatectomy, including 110 cases of robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy.一项 8 年单中心研究:170 例胰体中部切除术,其中 110 例为机器人辅助胰体中部切除术。
Surgery. 2020 Feb;167(2):436-441. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
10
Robotic-Assisted Pancreatic Resections.机器人辅助胰腺切除术
World J Surg. 2016 Oct;40(10):2497-506. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3565-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:一项包括患者亚组的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4131-4143. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09894-y. Epub 2023 Feb 13.