• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二甲双胍治疗的2型糖尿病患者使用度拉糖肽与西他列汀每周一次治疗2年后的安全性和有效性(AWARD-5):一项随机III期研究

Safety and efficacy of once-weekly dulaglutide versus sitagliptin after 2 years in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-5): a randomized, phase III study.

作者信息

Weinstock R S, Guerci B, Umpierrez G, Nauck M A, Skrivanek Z, Milicevic Z

机构信息

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

Diabetology, Metabolic Disease and Nutrition, University of Lorraine, CIC Inserm ILCV, CHU, Nancy, France.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Sep;17(9):849-58. doi: 10.1111/dom.12479. Epub 2015 May 20.

DOI:10.1111/dom.12479
PMID:25912221
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5008205/
Abstract

AIMS

To compare the once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor dulaglutide with the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor sitagliptin after 104 weeks of treatment.

METHODS

This AWARD-5 study was a multicentre, double-blind trial that randomized participants to dulaglutide (1.5 or 0.75 mg) or sitagliptin 100 mg for 104 weeks or placebo (reported separately) for 26 weeks. Change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration from baseline was the primary efficacy measure. A total of 1098 participants with HbA1c concentrations ≥7.0% (≥53.0 mmol/mol) and ≤9.5% (≤80.3 mmol/mol) were randomized, and 657 (59.8%) completed the study. We report results for dulaglutide and sitagliptin at the final endpoint.

RESULTS

Changes in HbA1c at 104 weeks were (least squares mean ± standard error) -0.99 ± 0.06% (-10.82 ± 0.66 mmol/mol), -0.71 ± 0.07% (-7.76 ± 0.77 mmol/mol) and -0.32 ± 0.06% (-3.50 ± 0.66 mmol/mol) for dulaglutide 1.5 mg, dulaglutide 0.75 mg and sitagliptin, respectively (p < 0.001, both dulaglutide doses vs sitagliptin). Weight loss was greater with dulaglutide 1.5 mg (p < 0.001) and similar with 0.75 mg versus sitagliptin (2.88 ± 0.25, 2.39 ± 0.26 and 1.75 ± 0.25 kg, respectively). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common with dulaglutide 1.5 and 0.75 mg versus sitagliptin (nausea 17 and 15% vs 7%, diarrhoea 16 and 12% vs 6%, vomiting 14 and 8% vs 4% respectively). Pancreatic, thyroid, cardiovascular and hypersensitivity safety were similar across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Dulaglutide doses provided superior glycaemic control and dulaglutide 1.5 mg resulted in greater weight reduction versus sitagliptin at 104 weeks, with acceptable safety.

摘要

目的

比较治疗104周后每周一次的胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂度拉糖肽与二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂西格列汀的疗效。

方法

这项AWARD-5研究是一项多中心、双盲试验,将参与者随机分为度拉糖肽组(1.5或0.75mg)或西格列汀100mg组,治疗104周,或安慰剂组(单独报告)治疗26周。糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)浓度相对于基线的变化是主要疗效指标。共有1098名HbA1c浓度≥7.0%(≥53.0mmol/mol)且≤9.5%(≤80.3mmol/mol)的参与者被随机分组,657名(59.8%)完成了研究。我们报告度拉糖肽和西格列汀在最终终点的结果。

结果

104周时,度拉糖肽1.5mg组、度拉糖肽0.75mg组和西格列汀组的HbA1c变化分别为(最小二乘均值±标准误)-0.99±0.06%(-10.82±0.66mmol/mol)、-0.71±0.07%(-7.76±0.77mmol/mol)和-0.32±0.06%(-3.50±0.66mmol/mol)(度拉糖肽两个剂量组与西格列汀相比,p<0.001)。度拉糖肽1.5mg组体重减轻更多(p<0.001),0.75mg组与西格列汀组体重减轻相似(分别为2.88±0.25、2.39±0.26和1.75±0.25kg)。度拉糖肽1.5mg和0.75mg组的胃肠道不良事件比西格列汀组更常见(恶心分别为17%和15% vs 7%,腹泻分别为16%和12% vs 6%,呕吐分别为14%和8% vs 4%)。各组的胰腺、甲状腺、心血管和超敏反应安全性相似。

结论

度拉糖肽各剂量组的血糖控制效果更佳,104周时,度拉糖肽1.5mg组比西格列汀组体重减轻更多,且安全性可接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/790b/5008205/b549ce050f06/DOM-17-849-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/790b/5008205/6a810b845d1d/DOM-17-849-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/790b/5008205/0622eedf52a7/DOM-17-849-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/790b/5008205/b549ce050f06/DOM-17-849-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/790b/5008205/6a810b845d1d/DOM-17-849-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/790b/5008205/0622eedf52a7/DOM-17-849-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/790b/5008205/b549ce050f06/DOM-17-849-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of once-weekly dulaglutide versus sitagliptin after 2 years in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-5): a randomized, phase III study.二甲双胍治疗的2型糖尿病患者使用度拉糖肽与西他列汀每周一次治疗2年后的安全性和有效性(AWARD-5):一项随机III期研究
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Sep;17(9):849-58. doi: 10.1111/dom.12479. Epub 2015 May 20.
2
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide versus sitagliptin after 52 weeks in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-5).一项随机对照试验(AWARD-5)中,度拉糖肽与西格列汀治疗2型糖尿病52周后的疗效与安全性
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2149-58. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2761. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
3
Efficacy and safety of LY3298176, a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, placebo-controlled and active comparator-controlled phase 2 trial.LY3298176,一种新型双重 GIP 和 GLP-1 受体激动剂,在 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性:一项随机、安慰剂对照和阳性对照药物对照的 2 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2180-2193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32260-8. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
4
Efficacy and safety of an expanded dulaglutide dose range: A phase 2, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes using metformin.度拉糖肽扩展剂量范围的疗效和安全性:二甲双胍治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的 2 期、安慰剂对照试验。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Sep;21(9):2048-2057. doi: 10.1111/dom.13764. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
5
Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.每周一次度拉鲁肽对比每日一次利拉鲁肽治疗二甲双胍控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者(AWARD-6):一项随机、开放标签、3 期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2014 Oct 11;384(9951):1349-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60976-4. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
6
Achieving the composite endpoint of glycated haemoglobin <7.0%, no weight gain and no hypoglycaemia in the once-weekly dulaglutide AWARD programme.在度拉糖肽每周一次给药的AWARD项目中实现糖化血红蛋白<7.0%、体重未增加且无低血糖的复合终点。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Jan;18(1):49-55. doi: 10.1111/dom.12575. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
7
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy versus metformin in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-3).在一项随机对照试验(AWARD-3)中,度拉鲁肽单药治疗与二甲双胍治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效和安全性。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2168-76. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2759. Epub 2014 May 19.
8
Efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide versus insulin glargine in mainly Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin and/or a sulphonylurea: A 52-week open-label, randomized phase III trial.每周一次度拉鲁肽对比甘精胰岛素在主要为亚洲 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性:一项为期 52 周、开放标签、随机 III 期临床试验,这些患者正在接受二甲双胍和/或磺脲类药物治疗。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Feb;21(2):234-243. doi: 10.1111/dom.13506. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
9
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide added onto pioglitazone and metformin versus exenatide in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-1).在一项随机对照试验(AWARD-1)中,与艾塞那肽相比,将度拉糖肽加用在吡格列酮和二甲双胍基础上治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效和安全性。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2159-67. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2760. Epub 2014 May 30.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).在二甲双胍和格列美脲治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中,每周一次度拉鲁肽与甘精胰岛素的疗效和安全性(AWARD-2)。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Dec;38(12):2241-9. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1625. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
GLP-1 receptor agonists and the risk for cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与癌症风险:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Aug;27(8):4454-4468. doi: 10.1111/dom.16489. Epub 2025 May 29.
2
Risk of Hearing Loss in Patients Treated with Exendin-4 Derivatives: A Network Meta-Analysis of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors.接受艾塞那肽-4衍生物治疗的患者发生听力损失的风险:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂的网络荟萃分析。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 May 16;18(5):735. doi: 10.3390/ph18050735.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.每周一次度拉鲁肽对比每日一次利拉鲁肽治疗二甲双胍控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者(AWARD-6):一项随机、开放标签、3 期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2014 Oct 11;384(9951):1349-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60976-4. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
2
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide added onto pioglitazone and metformin versus exenatide in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-1).在一项随机对照试验(AWARD-1)中,与艾塞那肽相比,将度拉糖肽加用在吡格列酮和二甲双胍基础上治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效和安全性。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2159-67. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2760. Epub 2014 May 30.
3
Dulaglutide 1.5 mg Significantly Improves Glycemic Control and Lowers LDL-Cholesterol and Body Weight in Romanian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
度拉糖肽1.5毫克显著改善罗马尼亚2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制,降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和体重。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 18;14(10):3536. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103536.
4
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与静脉血栓栓塞风险:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e039446. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039446. Epub 2025 May 2.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide Compared with GLP-1 RAs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Basal Insulin: A Network Meta-analysis.在接受基础胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,替尔泊肽与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂相比的疗效和安全性:一项网状Meta分析
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Jun;16(6):1279-1311. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01728-5. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
6
The pharmacodynamics-based prophylactic benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors on neurodegenerative diseases: evidence from a network meta-analysis.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂对神经退行性疾病基于药效学的预防作用:网状Meta分析证据
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 7;23(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04018-w.
7
Targeting Diabetic Atherosclerosis: The Role of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, SGLT2 Inhibitors, and Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Vascular Protection and Disease Modulation.靶向糖尿病动脉粥样硬化:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂、钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂和非甾体盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂在血管保护和疾病调节中的作用
Biomedicines. 2025 Mar 17;13(3):728. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030728.
8
Sex Differences in the Efficacy of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂减肥效果的性别差异:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Diabetes. 2025 Mar;17(3):e70063. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.70063.
9
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Weekly GLP-1/GIP Agonists vs. Weekly Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.每周一次的胰高血糖素样肽-1/葡萄糖依赖性促胰岛素多肽激动剂与每周一次胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Biomedicines. 2024 Aug 23;12(9):1943. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12091943.
10
Research Advances in Fusion Protein-Based Drugs for Diabetes Treatment.基于融合蛋白的糖尿病治疗药物研究进展
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024 Jan 23;17:343-362. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S421527. eCollection 2024.
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy versus metformin in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-3).
在一项随机对照试验(AWARD-3)中,度拉鲁肽单药治疗与二甲双胍治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效和安全性。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2168-76. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2759. Epub 2014 May 19.
4
Dose-finding results in an adaptive, seamless, randomized trial of once-weekly dulaglutide combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes patients (AWARD-5).在一项2型糖尿病患者中每周一次度拉鲁肽联合二甲双胍的适应性、无缝、随机试验中的剂量探索结果(AWARD-5)
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Aug;16(8):748-56. doi: 10.1111/dom.12305. Epub 2014 May 22.
5
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide versus sitagliptin after 52 weeks in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-5).一项随机对照试验(AWARD-5)中,度拉糖肽与西格列汀治疗2型糖尿病52周后的疗效与安全性
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2149-58. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2761. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
6
Efficacy and safety of lixisenatide once daily vs. placebo in people with Type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on metformin (GetGoal-F1).利司那肽每日一次与安慰剂对比治疗二甲双胍控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的疗效与安全性(GetGoal-F1研究)
Diabet Med. 2014 Feb;31(2):176-84. doi: 10.1111/dme.12328. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
7
A practice-based approach to the 2012 position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.基于实践的方法对 2012 年美国糖尿病协会和欧洲糖尿病研究协会立场声明的解读。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Jul;29(7):793-9. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.798637. Epub 2013 May 10.
8
Efficacy and safety of lixisenatide once-daily morning or evening injections in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin (GetGoal-M).二甲双胍控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者每日一次早晚注射利西那肽的疗效和安全性(GetGoal-M)。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2543-50. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2006. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
9
Exenatide once weekly: sustained improvement in glycemic control and cardiometabolic measures through 3 years.艾塞那肽每周一次:通过 3 年持续改善血糖控制和心血管代谢指标。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2013;6:31-41. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S35801. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
10
Effects of exenatide and liraglutide on heart rate, blood pressure and body weight: systematic review and meta-analysis.艾塞那肽和利拉鲁肽对心率、血压和体重的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 24;3(1):e001986. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001986.