Lahor-Soler Eduard, Miranda-Rius Jaume, Brunet-Llobet Lluís, Sabaté de la Cruz Xavier
Departament d'Odontostomatologia, Facultat d'Odontologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2015 Jun;123(3):194-201. doi: 10.1111/eos.12183. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
Patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices should take precautions when exposed to electromagnetic fields. Possible interference as a result of proximity to electromagnets or electricity flow from electronic tools employed in clinical odontology remains controversial. The objective of this study was to examine in vitro the capacity of dental equipment to provoke electromagnetic interference in pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Six electronic dental instruments were tested on three implantable cardioverter defibrillators and three pacemakers from different manufacturers. A simulator model, submerged in physiological saline, with elements that reproduced life-size anatomic structures was used. The instruments were analyzed at differing distances and for different time periods of application. The dental instruments studied displayed significant differences in their capacity to trigger electromagnetic interference. Significant differences in the quantity of registered interference were observed with respect to the variables manufacturer, type of cardiac implant, and application distance but not with the variable time of application. The electronic dental equipment tested at a clinical application distance (20 cm) provoked only slight interference in the pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators employed, irrespective of manufacturer.
植入式心脏电子设备的患者在暴露于电磁场时应采取预防措施。靠近电磁铁或临床口腔医学中使用的电子工具产生的电流可能导致的干扰仍存在争议。本研究的目的是在体外检测牙科设备引发起搏器和植入式心脏转复除颤器电磁干扰的能力。在来自不同制造商的三台植入式心脏转复除颤器和三台起搏器上测试了六种电子牙科器械。使用了一个浸没在生理盐水中的模拟器模型,其元件可再现真实大小的解剖结构。在不同距离和不同应用时间段对器械进行了分析。所研究的牙科器械在触发电磁干扰的能力方面表现出显著差异。在制造商、心脏植入类型和应用距离等变量方面观察到记录的干扰量存在显著差异,但在应用时间变量方面未观察到差异。在临床应用距离(20厘米)下测试的电子牙科设备对所使用的起搏器和植入式心脏转复除颤器仅产生轻微干扰,与制造商无关。