Research Center for Bioelectromagnetic Interaction (femu), Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, Aachen, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine I (Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine), University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Europace. 2019 Feb 1;21(2):219-229. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy155.
Electromagnetic fields (EMF) in the intermediate frequency (IF) range are generated by many novel electrical appliances, including electric vehicles, radiofrequency identification systems, induction hobs, or energy supply systems, such as wireless charging systems. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate whether cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI) in the IF range (1 kHz-1 MHz). Additionally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the different types of studies used to investigate EMI. Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement, we collected and evaluated studies examining EMI in in vivo studies, in vitro studies (phantom studies, benchmark tests), and simulation studies. Our analysis revealed that cardiac implants are susceptible to malfunction induced by EMF in the IF range. Electromagnetic interference may in particular be provoked by security systems and induction hobs. The results of the studies evaluated in this systematic review further indicate that the likelihood for EMI is dependent on exposure-related parameters (field strength, frequency, and modulation) and on implant- as well as on lead-related parameters (model, type of implant, implant sensitivity setting, lead configuration, and implantation site). The review shows that the factors influencing EMI are not sufficiently characterized and EMF limit values for CIED patients cannot be derived yet. Future studies should therefore, consider exposure-related parameters as well as implant- and lead-related parameters systematically. Additionally, worst-case scenarios should be considered in all study types where possible.
中频(IF)范围内的电磁场(EMF)由许多新型电器产生,包括电动汽车、射频识别系统、感应炉灶或无线充电系统等能源供应系统。本系统评价的目的是评估心血管植入式电子设备(CIED)是否易受 IF 范围内(1 kHz-1 MHz)的电磁干扰(EMI)影响。此外,我们还讨论了用于研究 EMI 的不同类型研究的优缺点。我们使用 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)声明收集和评估了研究 EMI 的体内研究、体外研究(模拟研究、基准测试)和模拟研究。我们的分析表明,心脏植入物易受 IF 范围内的电磁场引起的故障的影响。电磁干扰特别是可能会由安全系统和感应炉灶引起。本系统评价中评估的研究结果进一步表明,EMI 的可能性取决于与暴露相关的参数(场强、频率和调制)以及与植入物和导线相关的参数(型号、植入物类型、植入物灵敏度设置、导线配置和植入部位)。该综述表明,影响 EMI 的因素尚未得到充分描述,也无法为 CIED 患者推导 EMF 限值。因此,未来的研究应系统地考虑与暴露相关的参数以及与植入物和导线相关的参数。此外,应尽可能在所有研究类型中考虑最坏情况。