Heart Failure Unit, Cardiac Department, G. da Saliceto Polichirurgico Hospital, Piacenza, Italy.
Fondazione Gabriele Monasterio, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Jun;17(6):631-8. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.271. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
In heart failure (HF), exercise training programmes (ETPs) are a well-recognized intervention to improve symptoms, but are still poorly implemented. The Heart Failure Association promoted a survey to investigate whether and how cardiac centres in Europe are using ETPs in their HF patients.
The co-ordinators of the HF working groups of the countries affiliated to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) distributed and promoted the 12-item web-based questionnaire in the key cardiac centres of their countries. Forty-one country co-ordinators out of the 46 contacted replied to our questionnaire (89%). This accounted for 170 cardiac centres, responsible for 77,214 HF patients. The majority of the participating centres (82%) were general cardiology units and the rest were specialized rehabilitation units or local health centres. Sixty-seven (40%) centres [responsible for 36,385 (48%) patients] did not implement an ETP. This was mainly attributed to the lack of resources (25%), largely due to lack of staff or lack of financial provision. The lack of a national or local pathway for such a programme was the reason in 13% of the cases, and in 12% the perceived lack of evidence on safety or benefit was cited. When implemented, an ETP was proposed to all HF patients in only 55% of the centres, with restriction according to severity or aetiology.
With respect to previous surveys, there is evidence of increased availability of ETPs in HF in Europe, although too many patients are still denied a highly recommended therapy, mainly due to lack of resources or logistics.
在心力衰竭(HF)中,运动训练计划(ETP)是改善症状的一种公认干预措施,但实施情况仍不理想。心力衰竭协会进行了一项调查,以调查欧洲的心脏中心是否以及如何在其 HF 患者中使用 ETP。
与欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)附属国家的 HF 工作组协调员在其国家的主要心脏中心分发并推广了基于网络的 12 项问卷。在联系的 46 个国家协调员中,有 41 个(89%)回复了我们的问卷。这涉及到 170 个心脏中心,负责 77214 名 HF 患者。参与的大多数中心(82%)是普通心脏病学单位,其余的是专门的康复单位或当地卫生中心。67 个(40%)中心[负责 36385 名(48%)患者]没有实施 ETP。这主要归因于资源缺乏(25%),主要是由于缺乏工作人员或缺乏财务拨款。在 13%的情况下,缺乏国家或地方的方案途径是原因,在 12%的情况下,提到缺乏安全性或益处的证据。当实施 ETP 时,只有 55%的中心向所有 HF 患者提出了 ETP,根据严重程度或病因进行限制。
与以前的调查相比,欧洲 HF 中 ETP 的可用性有所增加,尽管仍有太多患者被剥夺了这种高度推荐的治疗方法,主要是由于资源或后勤方面的原因。