Suppr超能文献

种植体支持修复体与相邻天然牙之间的近中接触丧失:一项回顾性研究。

Proximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Wong Anita T Y, Wat Peter Y P, Pow Edmond H N, Leung Katherine C M

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Apr;26(4):e68-71. doi: 10.1111/clr.12353.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of proximal contact loss between posterior implant-supported prostheses and the adjacent anterior natural tooth and to identify potential contributing factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five consecutive patients, who had received either implant-supported fixed partial denture (FPD) or implant-supported single crown (SC) in the posterior region and were under regular review, were recruited. Interproximal space was assessed by the number of matrix bands that could be placed, and tooth mobility was assessed by Periotest®. A self-reported questionnaire was administered. Effects of various patient and prosthesis parameters on interproximal space were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test or Mann-Whitney U test. Correlations were tested by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Forty-three of 66 (65%) prostheses showed proximal contact loss. Frequent food packing was reported in 40% of the prostheses. The mean interproximal space was 167 (SD = 125) μm, and it was positively correlated with patients' age (P = 0.031) and time since prostheses delivery (P = 0.002). The interproximal space in the FPD group was significantly larger than the SC group (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Proximal contact loss is not uncommon in posterior implant-supported prostheses. In this study, age of the patient, prosthesis type and time since delivery of prosthesis were found to be contributing factors.

摘要

目的

确定种植体支持的后牙修复体与相邻前牙天然牙之间近中接触丧失的患病率,并识别潜在的影响因素。

材料与方法

招募了45例连续患者,这些患者在后部区域接受了种植体支持的固定局部义齿(FPD)或种植体支持的单冠(SC)修复,且正在接受定期复查。通过可放置的基质带数量评估邻间隙,通过Periotest®评估牙齿松动度。发放了一份自填式问卷。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验或Mann-Whitney U检验分析各种患者和修复体参数对邻间隙的影响。通过Spearman等级相关系数检验相关性。若P < 0.05,则认为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

66个修复体中有43个(65%)出现近中接触丧失。40%的修复体报告有频繁的食物嵌塞。平均邻间隙为167(标准差 = 125)μm,且与患者年龄(P = 0.031)和修复体戴入后的时间(P = 0.002)呈正相关。FPD组的邻间隙显著大于SC组(P = 0.008)。

结论

种植体支持的后牙修复体中近中接触丧失并不少见。在本研究中,发现患者年龄、修复体类型和修复体戴入后的时间是影响因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验