• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于定义仿制药产品的术语使用差异的相关性。

Relevance of variation in use of terminology to define generic pharmaceutical products.

作者信息

Fonseca Elize Massard da

机构信息

Business Administration School of São Paulo, Center for Public Administration and Government Studies, Fundação Getulio Vargas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015 Feb;37(2):113-7.

PMID:25915016
Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) promotes the use of generic drug policies to foster competition in the pharmaceutical sector, reduce drug prices, and increase access to therapeutic drugs. However, little is known about how countries implement these policies. This article describes different terminology adopted by national regulatory authorities to define generic versus proprietary drug products in developing countries, including those in Latin America, and challenges that arise in their application of WHO guidelines, such as labeling issues. The author concludes that variation in generics terminology in these countries is a result of institutional context (i.e., the public sector setting as well as the body of laws and regulations that exists in the country) and policy legacies, such as intellectual property regimes, and highlights the need for further analysis of pharmaceutical regulations to improve understanding of the barriers and political implications of generic drug policies.

摘要

世界卫生组织(WHO)推行使用通用药物政策,以促进制药行业的竞争、降低药品价格并增加治疗药物的可及性。然而,对于各国如何实施这些政策却知之甚少。本文描述了发展中国家(包括拉丁美洲国家)的国家监管机构用于界定通用药品与专利药品的不同术语,以及在应用WHO指南时出现的挑战,如标签问题。作者得出结论,这些国家通用药物术语的差异是制度背景(即公共部门环境以及该国存在的法律法规体系)和政策遗留问题(如知识产权制度)的结果,并强调需要进一步分析药品法规,以更好地理解通用药物政策的障碍和政治影响。

相似文献

1
Relevance of variation in use of terminology to define generic pharmaceutical products.用于定义仿制药产品的术语使用差异的相关性。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015 Feb;37(2):113-7.
2
The Politics and Policies of Regulating Generics in Latin America: A Survey of Seventeen States.拉丁美洲仿制药监管的政治与政策:对十七个国家的调查
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Jun;42(3):485-512. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3802953. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Multisource drug policies in Latin America: survey of 10 countries.拉丁美洲的多源药物政策:对10个国家的调查
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Jan;83(1):64-70. Epub 2005 Jan 21.
4
[Defining generic drugs: an end or a means? Analysis of regulations in 14 countries in the Region of the Americas].[定义仿制药:目的还是手段?美洲地区14个国家的法规分析]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2006 Nov;20(5):314-23. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892006001000004.
5
Generic drug prices and policy in Australia: room for improvement? a comparative analysis with England.澳大利亚的仿制药价格与政策:有改进空间吗?与英国的比较分析。
Aust Health Rev. 2014 Feb;38(1):6-15. doi: 10.1071/AH12009.
6
Global pharmaceutical regulation: the challenge of integration for developing states.全球药品监管:发展中国家面临的整合挑战。
Global Health. 2016 Dec 20;12(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0208-2.
7
European healthcare policies for controlling drug expenditure.欧洲控制药品支出的医疗政策。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(2):89-103. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321020-00002.
8
The impact of the legal regime of intellectual property protection in the pharmaceutical market.知识产权保护法律制度对药品市场的影响。
Wiad Lek. 2016;69(3 pt 2):582-586.
9
Has the implementation of the TRIPS Agreement in Latin America and the Caribbean produced intellectual property legislation that favours public health?《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》(TRIPS协定)在拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的实施是否产生了有利于公共卫生的知识产权立法?
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Nov;82(11):815-21. Epub 2004 Dec 14.
10
Policies to promote use of generic medicines in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature, 2000-2010.促进中低收入国家使用仿制药的政策:2000-2010 年已发表文献综述。
Health Policy. 2012 Aug;106(3):211-24. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.04.015. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The implementation of the bioequivalence certification policy in Chile: An analysis of market authorization data.智利实施生物等效性认证政策:对市场授权数据的分析。
PLoS One. 2019 May 29;14(5):e0217334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217334. eCollection 2019.