Suppr超能文献

阅读过程中形式与预期匹配对首次眼动测量的影响。

Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

作者信息

Farmer Thomas A, Yan Shaorong, Bicknell Klinton, Tanenhaus Michael K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Iowa.

Department of Linguistics, Northwestern University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):958-76. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000054. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

Abstract

Recent Electroencephalography/Magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG) studies suggest that when contextual information is highly predictive of some property of a linguistic signal, expectations generated from context can be translated into surprisingly low-level estimates of the physical form-based properties likely to occur in subsequent portions of the unfolding signal. Whether form-based expectations are generated and assessed during natural reading, however, remains unclear. We monitored eye movements while participants read phonologically typical and atypical nouns in noun-predictive contexts (Experiment 1), demonstrating that when a noun is strongly expected, fixation durations on first-pass eye movement measures, including first fixation duration, gaze duration, and go-past times, are shorter for nouns with category typical form-based features. In Experiments 2 and 3, typical and atypical nouns were placed in sentential contexts normed to create expectations of variable strength for a noun. Context and typicality interacted significantly at gaze duration. These results suggest that during reading, form-based expectations that are translated from higher-level category-based expectancies can facilitate the processing of a word in context, and that their effect on lexical processing is graded based on the strength of category expectancy.

摘要

近期的脑电图/脑磁图(EEG/MEG)研究表明,当语境信息能高度预测语言信号的某些属性时,由语境产生的预期可转化为对后续展开信号中可能出现的基于物理形式的属性的惊人低层次估计。然而,在自然阅读过程中是否会产生并评估基于形式的预期仍不明确。我们在参与者于名词预测性语境中阅读语音典型和非典型名词时监测了眼动(实验1),结果表明,当强烈预期某个名词时,对于具有基于类别典型形式特征的名词,首次通过眼动测量(包括首次注视时长、凝视时长和越过时间)的注视时长更短。在实验2和3中,将典型和非典型名词置于经标准化处理以对名词产生不同强度预期的句子语境中。在凝视时长方面,语境和典型性存在显著交互作用。这些结果表明,在阅读过程中,从更高层次基于类别的预期转化而来的基于形式的预期能够促进语境中单词的加工,并且它们对词汇加工的影响会根据类别预期的强度进行分级。

相似文献

1
Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):958-76. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000054. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
2
An eye movement corpus study of the age-of-acquisition effect.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1915-1921. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1233-8.
3
Lexical Preactivation in Basic Linguistic Phrases.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Oct;27(10):1912-35. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00822. Epub 2015 May 11.
4
Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
Cortex. 2015 Jul;68:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
5
Looking for immediate and downstream evidence of lexical prediction in eye movements during reading.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Oct;77(10):2040-2064. doi: 10.1177/17470218231223858. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
7
Do effects of visual contrast and font difficulty on readers' eye movements interact with effects of word frequency or predictability?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Nov;46(11):1235-1251. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000853. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
8
Visual context constrains language-mediated anticipatory eye movements.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Mar;73(3):458-467. doi: 10.1177/1747021819881615. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
9
Neural Correlates of Word Recognition: A Systematic Comparison of Natural Reading and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Sep;28(9):1374-91. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00977. Epub 2016 May 11.
10
Eye movements and anaphor resolution: effects of antecedent typicality and distance.
Lang Speech. 1990 Apr-Jun;33 ( Pt 2):103-19. doi: 10.1177/002383099003300201.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye movements during text reading align with the rate of speech production.
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Mar;6(3):429-442. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01215-4. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
Merging Generative Linguistics and Psycholinguistics.
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 28;9:2283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02283. eCollection 2018.
3
The effect of character contextual diversity on eye movements in Chinese sentence reading.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1971-1979. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1278-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Interpreting prosodic cues in discourse context.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Jan 1;30(1-2):149-166. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.862285.
2
Multi-voxel pattern analysis of noun and verb differences in ventral temporal cortex.
Brain Lang. 2014 Oct;137:40-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
3
Getting ahead: forward models and their place in cognitive architecture.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Sep;18(9):451-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
4
Phonemes and Production.
Lang Cogn Process. 2014 Jan 1;29(1):30-32. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.851795.
5
The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Feb;18(2):90-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
6
Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Dec;3(4):504-9. doi: 10.3758/BF03214555.
7
Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension.
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e77661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077661. eCollection 2013.
8
Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas.
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):904-11. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5.
9
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension.
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):329-47. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12001495. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
10
Prediction, explanation, and the role of generative models in language processing.
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Jun;36(3):211-2. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002312. Epub 2013 May 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验