• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎管狭窄症住院与门诊棘突间装置置入的对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient Interspinous Process Device Placement for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

作者信息

Ortega Alicia, Sarmiento J Manuel, Patil Chirag, Mukherjee Debraj, Ugiliweneza Beatrice, Nuño Miriam, Lad Shivanand, Boakye Maxwell

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States.

出版信息

J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;76(6):443-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1382785. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1382785
PMID:25915499
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare reoperations, health care utilization, and costs in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients undergoing interspinous process (ISP) device placement in an inpatient versus outpatient setting.

METHODS

The MarketScan database (2007-2009) was queried for adults with LSS undergoing ISP device placement as a primary procedure. Reoperations, health care utilization, and costs in patients with at least 18 months of follow-up were analyzed. Chi-square and Student t tests were used to assess the differences in characteristics and outcomes between patients treated in the inpatient and outpatient setting.

RESULTS

A total of 411 patients who underwent ISP device placement were identified; the mean age was 72 years, 51% were female, and most patients were insured by Medicare (73.7%). The average postoperative follow-up was 24.9 months. A subset of 182 patients (44.3%) had inpatient procedures; 229 (55.7%) underwent outpatient ISP device placements. The overall reoperation rate was 20.4%. ISP reoperation rates between inpatient and outpatient cohorts were comparable (23.1% versus 18.3%; p = 0.24). Inpatients accrued significantly higher index procedural costs compared with outpatients ($17,432 versus $8854; p = 0.0001), however, the outpatient cohort utilized more postoperative outpatient services (143 versus 112; p = 0.09) and higher outpatient service costs ($25,376 versus $15,481; p = 0.01). Consequently, cumulative overall cost was similar among the two cohorts ($51,059 versus $51,778; p = 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term reoperation rates following ISP device placement are comparable in the inpatient and outpatient setting. Upfront cost savings may be achieved with outpatient ISP device placement, but this benefit is lost by 18 months following initial surgery.

摘要

目的

比较在住院和门诊环境下接受棘突间(ISP)装置置入的腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者的再次手术情况、医疗保健利用情况和费用。

方法

查询MarketScan数据库(2007 - 2009年)中接受ISP装置置入作为主要手术的成年LSS患者。对随访至少18个月的患者的再次手术情况、医疗保健利用情况和费用进行分析。采用卡方检验和学生t检验评估住院和门诊治疗患者在特征和结局方面的差异。

结果

共确定411例接受ISP装置置入的患者;平均年龄为72岁,51%为女性,大多数患者由医疗保险承保(73.7%)。术后平均随访时间为24.9个月。182例患者(44.3%)接受了住院手术;229例(55.7%)接受了门诊ISP装置置入。总体再次手术率为20.4%。住院和门诊队列之间的ISP再次手术率相当(23.1%对18.3%;p = 0.24)。与门诊患者相比,住院患者的首次手术费用显著更高(17432美元对8854美元;p = 0.0001),然而,门诊队列使用了更多的术后门诊服务(143次对112次;p = 0.09)且门诊服务费用更高(25376美元对15481美元;p = 0.01)。因此,两组的累计总成本相似(51059美元对51778美元;p = 0.94)。

结论

在住院和门诊环境下,ISP装置置入后的长期再次手术率相当。门诊ISP装置置入可实现前期成本节约,但在初次手术后18个月这种益处就会消失。

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient Interspinous Process Device Placement for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症住院与门诊棘突间装置置入的对比分析
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;76(6):443-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1382785. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
2
Interspinous device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative effectiveness study.棘突间装置与椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症:一项比较有效性研究。
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1484-92. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.053. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
3
Reoperation and revision rates of 3 surgical treatment methods for lumbar stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.腰椎狭窄伴退变性脊柱侧凸和脊椎滑脱 3 种手术治疗方法的再手术和翻修率。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 15;38(26):2287-94. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000068.
4
Readmission rates after decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群腰椎狭窄症减压手术后的再入院率。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 1;38(7):591-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828628f5.
5
Comparative outcomes and cost-utility after surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee--part 1: long-term change in health-related quality of life.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,腰椎局灶性狭窄症的手术治疗的比较结果和成本-效用——第 1 部分:健康相关生活质量的长期变化。
Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):234-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
6
X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.X 型截骨术与减压手术治疗腰椎源性神经间歇性跛行的随机对照试验:2 年随访。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Aug 1;38(17):1436-42. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828ba413.
7
Disparities in the outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery based on insurance status.基于保险状况的腰椎狭窄症手术结果的差异。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 1;38(13):1119-27. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318287f04e.
8
Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,手术治疗局限性腰椎椎管狭窄症的比较结果和成本效用:第 2 部分——估计终生增量成本效用比。
Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
9
Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.经皮棘突间撑开器植入术与开放式减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Spine J. 2011 Oct;11(10):933-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.419.
10
Two-year follow-up after decompressive surgery with and without implantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective controlled study.腰椎管狭窄减压手术联合与不联合棘突间装置植入的两年随访:一项前瞻性对照研究。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Aug;27(6):336-41. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31825f7203.

引用本文的文献

1
Readability Analysis of Patient-Accessible Information Regarding Ambulatory Surgical Center Procedures.关于门诊手术中心手术的患者可获取信息的可读性分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):1046-1053. doi: 10.14444/8133. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
2
Spine surgeon ownership of ambulatory surgery centers.脊柱外科医生对门诊手术中心的所有权。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(Suppl 5):S161. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.05.89.
3
Dimensions of the spinous process and interspinous space: a morphometric study.棘突及棘突间间隙的尺寸:一项形态测量学研究。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2018 Dec;40(12):1383-1390. doi: 10.1007/s00276-018-2096-z. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
4
Utilization of Interspinous Devices Throughout the United States Over a Recent Decade: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.近十年间美国棘突间装置的使用情况:基于全国住院患者样本的分析
Global Spine J. 2018 Jun;8(4):382-387. doi: 10.1177/2192568217731336. Epub 2017 Sep 14.