• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用软凝系统预凝和超声解剖的双外科医生肝脏离断技术

Two-surgeon technique for liver transection using precoagulation by a soft-coagulation system and ultrasonic dissection.

作者信息

Yamada Nobuya, Amano Ryosuke, Kimura Kenjiro, Murata Akihiro, Yashiro Masakazu, Tanaka Sayaka, Wakasa Kenichi, Hirakawa Kosei

出版信息

Hepatogastroenterology. 2015 Mar-Apr;62(138):389-92.

PMID:25916069
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A soft-coagulation system (SCS) was introduced as an effective device to reduce blood loss in hepatectomy. Here we evaluated the efficacy of a two-surgeon technique using precoagulation by an SCS and the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) for liver transection.

METHODOLOGY

The 163 patients with liver tumors were divided into two groups (conventional group and two-surgeon group). Liver transection was conducted using saline-coupled bipolar electrocautery and CUSA in 102 patients (conventional group). In 61 patients (the two-surgeon group), a two-surgeon technique using precoagulation by an SCS and CUSA for liver resection was performed.

RESULTS

The median blood loss was significantly less in the two-surgeon group compared to the conventional group (354.8 mL vs. 557.8 mL, respec tively: p = 0.0011). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the two-surgeon group compared to the conventional group (12.7 days vs. 15.5 days, p = 0.0035).

CONCLUSIONS

The two-surgeon technique using precoagulation by an SCS and CUSA was significantly reduced blood loss during liver transection, and associated with low morbidity and mortality. This technique may be useful for many hepatobiliary surgeons.

摘要

背景/目的:引入一种软凝固系统(SCS)作为减少肝切除术失血的有效设备。在此,我们评估了一种双术者技术的疗效,该技术使用SCS预凝固和超声外科吸引器(CUSA)进行肝实质离断。

方法

163例肝肿瘤患者分为两组(传统组和双术者组)。102例患者(传统组)使用生理盐水耦合双极电凝和CUSA进行肝实质离断。61例患者(双术者组)采用双术者技术,使用SCS预凝固和CUSA进行肝切除。

结果

双术者组的术中失血量中位数显著低于传统组(分别为354.8 mL和557.8 mL:p = 0.0011)。双术者组的术后住院时间显著短于传统组(12.7天对15.5天,p = 0.0035)。

结论

使用SCS预凝固和CUSA的双术者技术在肝实质离断期间显著减少了失血量,且发病率和死亡率较低。该技术可能对许多肝胆外科医生有用。

相似文献

1
Two-surgeon technique for liver transection using precoagulation by a soft-coagulation system and ultrasonic dissection.采用软凝系统预凝和超声解剖的双外科医生肝脏离断技术
Hepatogastroenterology. 2015 Mar-Apr;62(138):389-92.
2
LigaSure versus CUSA for parenchymal transection during laparoscopic hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score-matched analysis. LigaSure 与 CUSA 用于肝硬化肝细胞癌患者腹腔镜肝切除术中肝实质离断的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2454-2465. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5947-5. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
3
The superficial precoagulation, sealing, and transection method: a "bloodless" and "ecofriendly" laparoscopic liver transection technique.浅表预凝血、封闭及横断法:一种“无血”且“环保”的腹腔镜肝横断技术。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Feb;25(1):e33-e36. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000051.
4
Suprahilar vascular control and stapling device transection of Glissonian pedicle in major and minor hepatectomies.肝门上方血管控制及在肝大部切除术和肝小部切除术中用吻合器离断肝蒂
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Nov-Dec;60(128):2060-8. doi: 10.5754/hge13512.
5
A prospective randomized controlled trial of hemostasis with a bipolar sealer during hepatic transection for liver resection.在肝切除术中使用双极电凝止血与肝断面止血的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surgery. 2013 Nov;154(5):1046-52. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.053. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
6
Impact of the VIO system in hepatic resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.VIO 系统对肝癌患者肝切除手术的影响。
Surg Today. 2012 Dec;42(12):1176-82. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0306-6. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
7
Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma using a microwave tissue coagulator: Experience of 1118 cases.使用微波组织凝固器进行肝细胞癌肝切除术:1118例经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 28;21(36):10400-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10400.
8
Two different methods for donor hepatic transection: cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator with bipolar cautery versus cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator with radiofrequency coagulator-A randomized controlled trial.两种不同的供肝切断方法:双极电凝超声外科吸引器与射频凝固超声外科吸引器——一项随机对照试验
Liver Transpl. 2009 Jan;15(1):102-5. doi: 10.1002/lt.21658.
9
Two-surgeon technique using saline-linked electric cautery and ultrasonic surgical aspirator in living donor hepatectomy: its safety and efficacy.在活体供肝肝切除术中使用生理盐水连接电灼器和超声外科吸引器的双术者技术:其安全性和有效性。
Am J Surg. 2009 Feb;197(2):e25-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.01.019. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
10
The impact of the CUSA ultrasonic dissection device on major liver resections.CUSA超声解剖设备对肝脏大手术的影响。
Neth J Surg. 1991 Aug;43(4):99-101.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the number of operating specialists influence the conversion rate and outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery?腹腔镜结直肠癌手术后,手术专家的数量是否会影响转化率和结果?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3652-3658. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6097-0. Epub 2018 Feb 13.