Kuzma Kristin, Lim Andrew George, Kepha Bernard, Nalitolela Neema Evelyne, Reynolds Teri A
Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington-Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 27;5(4):e006921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006921.
We sought to characterise the prehospital experience of Tanzanian trauma patients, and identify barriers and facilitators to implement community-based emergency medical systems (EMS).
Our study was conducted in the emergency department of an urban national referral hospital in Tanzania.
A convenience sample of 34 adult trauma patients, or surrogate family members, presenting or referred to an urban referral emergency department in Tanzania for treatment of injury, participated in the study.
Participation in semistructured, iteratively developed interviews until saturation of responses was reached.
A grounded theory-based approach to qualitative analysis was used to identify recurrent themes.
We characterised numerous deficiencies within the existing clinic-to-hospital referral network, including missed/delayed diagnoses, limited management capabilities at pre-referral facilities and interfacility transfer delays. Potential barriers to EMS implementation include patient financial limitations and lack of insurance, limited public infrastructure and resources, and the credibility of potential first aid responders. Potential facilitators of EMS include communities' tendency to pool resources, individuals' trust of other community members to be first aid responders, and faith in community leaders to organise EMS response. Participants expressed a strong desire to learn first aid.
The composite themes generated by the data suggest that there are myriad structural, financial, institutional and cultural barriers to the implementation of a formal prehospital system. However, our analysis also revealed potential facilitators to a first-responder system that takes advantage of close-knit local communities and the trust of recognised leaders in society. The results suggest favourable acceptability for community-based response by trained lay people. There is significant opportunity for care improvements with short trainings and low-cost supply planning. Further research looking at the effects of delay on outcomes in this population is needed.
我们试图描述坦桑尼亚创伤患者的院前经历,并确定实施基于社区的紧急医疗系统(EMS)的障碍和促进因素。
我们的研究在坦桑尼亚一家城市国家级转诊医院的急诊科进行。
选取了34名成年创伤患者或其替代家庭成员作为便利样本,这些患者因受伤到坦桑尼亚一家城市转诊急诊科就诊或被转诊至此,参与了本研究。
参与半结构化、反复开展的访谈,直至回答达到饱和。
采用基于扎根理论的定性分析方法来确定反复出现的主题。
我们描述了现有诊所到医院转诊网络中的诸多缺陷,包括漏诊/延误诊断、转诊前设施的管理能力有限以及机构间转运延迟。实施EMS的潜在障碍包括患者经济受限和缺乏保险、公共基础设施和资源有限以及潜在急救人员的可信度。EMS的潜在促进因素包括社区资源集中的倾向、个人对其他社区成员作为急救人员的信任以及对社区领袖组织EMS响应的信任。参与者表达了强烈的学习急救的愿望。
数据产生的综合主题表明,实施正式的院前系统存在无数结构、财务、机构和文化障碍。然而,我们的分析还揭示了利用紧密联系的当地社区以及社会公认领袖的信任建立急救系统的潜在促进因素。结果表明受过培训的非专业人员对基于社区的响应具有良好的接受度。通过短期培训和低成本供应规划,护理改善有很大机会。需要进一步研究延迟对该人群结局的影响。