Suppr超能文献

应用生物药剂学分类系统(BCS)标准预测犬类药物的口服吸收:挑战与陷阱

Applying Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) Criteria to Predict Oral Absorption of Drugs in Dogs: Challenges and Pitfalls.

作者信息

Papich Mark G, Martinez Marilyn N

机构信息

College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607, USA,

出版信息

AAPS J. 2015 Jul;17(4):948-64. doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9743-7. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

Abstract

The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) has been a prognostic tool for assessing the potential effects of formulation on the human drug oral bioavailability. When used in conjunction with in vitro dissolution tests, the BCS can support the prediction of in vivo product performance and the development of mechanistic models that support formulation assessments through the generation of "what if" scenarios. To date, the applicability of existing human BCS criteria has not been evaluated in dogs, thereby limiting its use in canine drug development. Therefore, we examined 50 drugs for which absolute bioavailability (F) was available both in dogs and humans. The drugs were also evaluated for any potential association between solubility (calculated from the dose number, Do) or lipophilicity (LogP) and F in dogs. In humans, solubility is determined in 250 mL of fluid. However, the appropriate volume for classifying drug solubility in dogs has not been established. In this analysis, the estimated volume of a water flush administered to fasted dogs (6 mL) and a volume of 250 mL scaled to a Beagle dog (35 mL) were examined. In addition, in humans, a Do value greater than 1.0 is used to define a compound as highly soluble and a LogP value greater than 1.72 as high permeability. These same criteria were applied for defining highly soluble and highly permeable in dogs. Whether using 35 or 6 mL to determine Do, the canine solubility classification remained unchanged for all but seven compounds. There were no clear associations between a drug's F in dogs and humans or between the canine value of F and either its human BCS classification, its LogP value, or the canine Do estimate. There was a tendency for those drugs with canine values of F equal to or greater than 80% to have LogP values equal to or greater than 1.0. Exceptions to this observation tended to be those compounds known to be absorbed via mechanisms other than passive diffusion (e.g., via transporters or paracellular transporters). Although there are limitations to the approach used in this study, the results of our assessment strongly suggest that the human BCS classification system requires substantial modification before it can be reliably applied to dogs.

摘要

生物药剂学分类系统(BCS)一直是一种用于评估制剂对人体药物口服生物利用度潜在影响的预测工具。当与体外溶出试验结合使用时,BCS可支持体内产品性能的预测以及通过生成“如果……会怎样”的情景来支持制剂评估的机理模型的开发。迄今为止,现有的人体BCS标准在犬类中的适用性尚未得到评估,从而限制了其在犬类药物开发中的应用。因此,我们研究了50种在犬类和人类中均有绝对生物利用度(F)数据的药物。还评估了这些药物在犬类中的溶解度(根据剂量数Do计算)或亲脂性(LogP)与F之间的任何潜在关联。在人类中,溶解度是在250 mL液体中测定的。然而,尚未确定用于分类犬类药物溶解度的合适体积。在本分析中,研究了给予空腹犬类的水冲洗估计体积(6 mL)以及按比格犬换算的250 mL体积(35 mL)。此外,在人类中,Do值大于1.0用于将化合物定义为高溶解性,LogP值大于1.72用于定义为高渗透性。这些相同的标准也用于定义犬类中的高溶解性和高渗透性。无论使用35 mL还是6 mL来确定Do,除了七种化合物外,所有化合物的犬类溶解度分类均保持不变。犬类和人类中药物的F之间,或者犬类F值与其人类BCS分类、LogP值或犬类Do估计值之间均无明显关联。犬类F值等于或大于80%的那些药物往往具有等于或大于1.0的LogP值。该观察结果的例外情况往往是那些已知通过被动扩散以外的机制(例如通过转运体或细胞旁转运体)吸收的化合物。尽管本研究中使用的方法存在局限性,但我们的评估结果强烈表明,人体BCS分类系统在能够可靠地应用于犬类之前需要进行大量修改。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
Chitosan/Alginate-Based Nanoparticles for Antibacterial Agents Delivery.壳聚糖/海藻酸钠基纳米粒子用于抗菌剂递送。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2024 May 30;19:5021-5044. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S469572. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

4
Animal versus human oral drug bioavailability: do they correlate?动物与人类口服药物的生物利用度:它们相关吗?
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014 Jun 16;57(100):280-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验