Austin Jennifer L, Groves Emily A, Reynish Lisa C, Francis Laura L
University of South Wales.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Summer;48(2):274-88. doi: 10.1002/jaba.208. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
There is growing evidence to support the use of trial-based functional analyses, particularly in classroom settings. However, there currently are no evaluations of this procedure with typically developing children. Furthermore, it is possible that refinements may be needed to adapt trial-based analyses to mainstream classrooms. This study was designed to expand the trial-based functional analysis literature by implementing the procedure in 2 mainstream primary school classrooms and validating the analysis through comparison of multiple treatment options, including some that were not indicated by the functional analysis. We also extended the procedure by including a peer-attention condition and obtaining data from teachers regarding the feasibility of the procedures. For all participants, functional analysis results helped to identify effective treatments. Furthermore, relative effects among treatments were accurately predicted by the functional analysis outcomes. Teachers reported that they understood the logic of functional analysis and found both analysis and treatment procedures to be easy and effective.
越来越多的证据支持使用基于试验的功能分析,尤其是在课堂环境中。然而,目前还没有针对正常发育儿童对该程序的评估。此外,可能需要对基于试验的分析进行改进,以使其适用于主流课堂。本研究旨在通过在2个主流小学课堂中实施该程序,并通过比较多种治疗方案(包括一些功能分析未表明的方案)来验证分析,从而扩展基于试验的功能分析文献。我们还通过纳入同伴关注条件并从教师那里获取有关程序可行性的数据来扩展该程序。对于所有参与者,功能分析结果有助于确定有效的治疗方法。此外,功能分析结果准确地预测了不同治疗方法之间的相对效果。教师报告说,他们理解功能分析的逻辑,并且发现分析和治疗程序既简单又有效。