Brunetto Algemir L, Castillo Luis A, Petrilli Antonio S, Macedo Carla D, Boldrini Erica, Costa Cecilia, Almeida Maria T, Kirst Daniela, Rodriguez-Galindo Carlos, Pereira Waldir V, Watanabe Flora M, Pizza Maria, Benites Eliana, Morais Vera, Gadelha Andréa, Nakasato Antônio, Abujamra Ana L, Gregianin Lauro J
Children's Cancer Institute, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Hospital Pereira Rossell, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Oct;62(10):1747-53. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25562. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
Large cooperative group studies have shown the efficacy of risk-adapted treatment for Ewing sarcoma. However, validation and local adaptation by National cooperative groups is needed. A multicenter protocol to determine the efficacy and safety of a risk-adapted intensive regimen was developed by the Brazilian cooperative group.
Patients <30 years old with Ewing sarcoma were eligible. Induction chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) followed by two cycles of VDC (vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide), followed by local control. Patients with low risk (LR) disease (localized resectable with normal LDH) received 10 additional alternating courses of IE with VDC. For patients with high-risk (HR) disease (unresectable, pelvic, metastatic, or high LDH), two additional cycles of ICE were given.
One-hundred seventy five patients (39% metastatic) were enrolled. Fifty-two patients (29.7%) were LR and 123 (70.3%) were HR. Overall response rate at end of induction was 27.4%. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates were 51.4% and 54.4%, respectively. Patients with localized disease had better outcomes than patients with metastases (5-year EFS 67.9% vs. 25.5%, and 5-year OS 70.3% vs. 29.1%, respectively). On multivariate analysis, the presence of metastatic disease was the only prognostic factor (P < 0.01).
The VDC/ICE protocol was feasible, and considering the high tumor burden in our population, resulted in comparable results to those reported by cooperative groups in high-income countries. Further adaptation to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity will be required.
大型合作组研究已显示风险适应性治疗对尤因肉瘤的疗效。然而,国家合作组需要进行验证和局部调整。巴西合作组制定了一项多中心方案,以确定风险适应性强化方案的疗效和安全性。
年龄<30岁的尤因肉瘤患者符合条件。诱导化疗包括两个周期的ICE(异环磷酰胺、卡铂和依托泊苷),随后是两个周期的VDC(长春新碱、阿霉素和环磷酰胺),然后进行局部控制。低风险(LR)疾病(局部可切除且乳酸脱氢酶正常)的患者额外接受10个周期的IE与VDC交替治疗。对于高风险(HR)疾病(不可切除、盆腔、转移或高乳酸脱氢酶)的患者,额外给予两个周期的ICE。
共纳入175例患者(39%为转移性)。52例患者(29.7%)为LR,123例(70.3%)为HR。诱导结束时的总体缓解率为27.4%。5年无事件生存率(EFS)和总生存率(OS)估计分别为51.4%和54.4%。局限性疾病患者的预后优于转移患者(5年EFS分别为67.9%和25.5%,5年OS分别为70.3%和29.1%)。多变量分析显示,转移性疾病的存在是唯一的预后因素(P<0.01)。
VDC/ICE方案是可行的,考虑到我们研究人群中肿瘤负荷较高,其结果与高收入国家合作组报告的结果相当。需要进一步调整以最大化疗效并最小化毒性。