Rasmussen Thomas, Køber Lars, Abdulla Jawdat, Pedersen Jesper Holst, Wille Mathilde Marie Winkler, Dirksen Asger, Kofoed Klaus Fuglsang
Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2015 Jun;49(3):159-67. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2015.1039572. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
It remains unknown whether non-electrocardiogram-gated coronary artery calcium (CAC) score in lung cancer screening provides incremental prognostic value. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of CAC in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST), in addition to conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis including previously published studies regarding CAC in lung cancer screening.
In DLCST, we measured Agatston CAC scores in 1,945 current and former smokers. Causes of death were extracted from the Danish National Death Registry. We used Cox proportional hazards model to determine hazard ratios (HRs) of CAC scores. A weighted fixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis.
Median follow-up in DLCST was 7.1 years, and 55% were men. Overall survival rates associated with CAC scores of 0, 1-400, and > 400 were 98%, 96%, and 92% (p < 0.001), respectively. Adjusted HR of cardiovascular death associated with CAC >400 was 3.8 (1.0-15) (p < 0.05). The meta-analysis included 28,045 asymptomatic participants. A high non-gated CAC score was associated with fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events (p < 0.0001).
Assessment of non-electrocardiogram-gated CAC in lung cancer screening programs is a robust prognostic measure of fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events in current and former smokers independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.
肺癌筛查中非心电图门控冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分是否具有额外的预后价值尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估丹麦肺癌筛查试验(DLCST)中CAC的预后价值,此外还进行一项系统评价和荟萃分析,纳入先前发表的关于肺癌筛查中CAC的研究。
在DLCST中,我们测量了1945名当前和既往吸烟者的阿加斯顿CAC评分。死亡原因从丹麦国家死亡登记处提取。我们使用Cox比例风险模型确定CAC评分的风险比(HRs)。荟萃分析采用加权固定效应模型。
DLCST的中位随访时间为7.1年,55%为男性。CAC评分为0、1 - 400和>400的总体生存率分别为98%、96%和92%(p<0.001)。与CAC>400相关的心血管死亡调整后HR为3.8(1.0 - 15)(p<0.05)。荟萃分析纳入了28045名无症状参与者。高非门控CAC评分与致命或非致命心血管事件相关(p<0.0001)。
在肺癌筛查项目中评估非心电图门控CAC是当前和既往吸烟者致命或非致命心血管事件的一种可靠预后指标,独立于传统心血管危险因素。