Suppr超能文献

青少年母亲教育的可接受性和初步效果。

Acceptability and initial efficacy of education for teen mothers.

作者信息

Logsdon M Cynthia, Davis Deborah Winders, Stikes Reetta, Ratterman Rachel, Ryan Lesa, Myers John

机构信息

M. Cynthia Logsdon is a Professor, School of Nursing, University of Louisville, Associate Chief of Nursing for Research, University of Louisville Hospital/Brown Cancer Center, 555 South Floyd Street, Health Sciences Center, Louisville, KY. She can be reached via e-mail at

出版信息

MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;40(3):186-92. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000126.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Educational materials used by healthcare agencies frequently do not follow national health guidelines for plain talk. Adolescent mothers are a vulnerable population in need of accurate and accessible health information to promote their own health and that of their baby. The aims of our study were to: Determine acceptability of simple, written educational pamphlets to adolescent mothers; Determine efficacy of simple, written educational pamphlets in improving an adolescent mother's knowledge related to breastfeeding, infant care, postpartum depression, and mother-infant relationship; Determine if higher knowledge scores are maintained after a 2-week period; and Determine general parenting health literacy of adolescent mothers.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Using a prospective, experimental design, students enrolled in a teen parent program (n = 123) completed a pretest and The Parent Health Literacy Activities Test (PHLAT), read the health educational materials, and completed an immediate posttest of knowledge and acceptability. Two weeks later, the same participants completed a second posttest of knowledge.

RESULTS

Adolescent mothers found the intervention (simple, written educational materials) to be acceptable. The intervention was initially effective in improving knowledge scores in all four content areas. However, knowledge was not retained and scores were not significantly different from baseline at the 2-week assessment. The mean health literacy of the adolescent mothers was poor.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A booster session may be necessary for knowledge retention. Other methods of education should be studied to evaluate efficacy for adolescent mothers' knowledge retention of important health information.

摘要

目的

医疗机构使用的教育材料常常不符合国家关于通俗易懂语言的健康指南。青春期母亲是弱势群体,需要准确且易于获取的健康信息来促进自身及婴儿的健康。我们研究的目的是:确定简单的书面教育手册对青春期母亲的可接受性;确定简单的书面教育手册在提高青春期母亲关于母乳喂养、婴儿护理、产后抑郁及母婴关系等知识方面的效果;确定在两周后较高的知识得分能否得以维持;以及确定青春期母亲的一般育儿健康素养。

研究设计与方法

采用前瞻性实验设计,参加青少年父母项目的学生(n = 123)完成了一项预测试和父母健康素养活动测试(PHLAT),阅读了健康教育材料,并完成了关于知识和可接受性的即时后测。两周后,相同的参与者完成了第二次知识后测。

结果

青春期母亲认为该干预措施(简单的书面教育材料)是可接受的。该干预措施最初在提高所有四个内容领域的知识得分方面是有效的。然而,知识未能得到保持,在两周评估时得分与基线相比无显著差异。青春期母亲的平均健康素养较差。

临床意义

可能需要进行强化课程以保持知识。应研究其他教育方法,以评估其对青春期母亲保留重要健康信息知识的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验