Alvis Madison L, Morris Cody E, Garrard Tiana L, Hughes Abigail G, Hunt Laura, Koester Megan M, Yocum India C, Tinius Rachel A
School of Kinesiology, Recreation & Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA.
Department of Human Studies, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2019 May 1;12(3):581-589. doi: 10.70252/NGXF7418. eCollection 2019.
Women who are pregnant report receiving little or no advice about physical activity during pregnancy from their obstetric provider. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an evidence-based educational brochure on both immediate and two-week retention of knowledge about exercise during pregnancy. Thirty-two women of childbearing age (age: 25.0 ± 4.0 years, body mass index: 29.5 ± 6.5 kg/m, 93.7% Caucasian, 83.4% had at least some college) completed a survey before exposure to an evidence-based educational brochure regarding exercise during pregnancy. Post surveys were taken immediately after viewing the educational brochure and again 2-weeks later. After exposure to educational brochures, survey scores on both surveys were significantly higher immediately-post and two-weeks post compared to baseline survey scores (Survey 1 (assessing beliefs) - pre: 79.2 ± 8.9%, post: 92.6 ± 7.4%, 2-weeks post: 92.0 ± 6.5%, < 0.001; Survey 2 (assessing knowledge) - pre: 65.3 ± 16.4%, post: 81.3 ± 14.9%, 2-weeks post: 78.8 ± 12.4%, < 0.001). No significant differences detected between immediate post and 2-weeks post for either Survey 1 ( = 0.72) or Survey 2 ( = 0.52); suggesting the information was retained. An evidence-based educational brochure is effective for improving and retaining information 2-weeks later regarding exercise during pregnancy. However, replication studies in more diverse populations are needed to confirm the results of this pilot study. The long-term goal for this line of research is to urge health care providers to consider providing patients with educational information in order to improve knowledge and patient-provider communication on this topic.
怀孕女性表示，她们从产科医生那里几乎没有得到或根本没有得到关于孕期体育活动的建议。本研究的目的是评估一份循证教育手册对孕期运动知识的即时留存率和两周留存率的有效性。32名育龄女性（年龄：25.0±4.0岁，体重指数：29.5±6.5kg/m²，93.7%为白种人，83.4%至少接受过一些大学教育）在接触一份关于孕期运动的循证教育手册之前完成了一项调查。在观看教育手册后立即进行了后测，并在两周后再次进行后测。接触教育手册后，两次调查的得分在即时后测和两周后测时均显著高于基线调查得分（调查1（评估信念）——前测：79.2±8.9%，后测：92.6±7.4%，两周后测：92.0±6.5%，P<0.001；调查2（评估知识）——前测：65.3±16.4%，后测：81.3±14.9%，两周后测：78.8±12.4%，P<0.001）。调查1（P=0.72）或调查2（P=0.52）在即时后测和两周后测之间均未检测到显著差异；这表明信息被留存了下来。一份循证教育手册对于在两周后提高和留存关于孕期运动的信息是有效的。然而，需要在更多样化的人群中进行重复研究以证实这项初步研究的结果。这一系列研究的长期目标是敦促医疗保健提供者考虑为患者提供教育信息，以提高关于这个主题的知识以及医患沟通。
