Chen Chen, Song Yufeng, Zhuang Kai, Li Lu, Xia Yan, Shen Zhenguo
College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 28;10(4):e0125367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125367. eCollection 2015.
To better understand the mechanisms involved in the heavy metal stress response and tolerance in plants, a proteomic approach was used to investigate the differences in Cu-binding protein expression in Cu-tolerant and Cu-sensitive rice varieties. Cu-binding proteins from Cu-treated rice roots were separated using a new IMAC method in which an IDA-sepharose column was applied prior to the Cu-IMAC column to remove metal ions from protein samples. More than 300 protein spots were reproducibly detected in the 2D gel. Thirty-five protein spots exhibited changes greater than 1.5-fold in intensity compared to the control. Twenty-four proteins contained one or more of nine putative metal-binding motifs reported by Smith et al., and 19 proteins (spots) contained one to three of the top six motifs reported by Kung et al. The intensities of seven protein spots were increased in the Cu-tolerant variety B1139 compared to the Cu-sensitive variety B1195 (p<0.05) and six protein spots were markedly up-regulated in B1139, but not detectable in B1195. Four protein spots were significantly up-regulated in B1139, but unchanged in B1195 under Cu stress. In contrast, two protein spots were significantly down-regulated in B1195, but unchanged in B1139. These Cu-responsive proteins included those involved in antioxidant defense and detoxification (spots 5, 16, 21, 22, 28, 29 and 33), pathogenesis (spots 5, 16, 21, 22, 28, 29 and 33), regulation of gene transcription (spots 8 and 34), amino acid synthesis (spots 8 and 34), protein synthesis, modification, transport and degradation (spots 1, 2, 4, 10, 15, 19, 30, 31, 32 and 35), cell wall synthesis (spot 14), molecular signaling (spot 3), and salt stress (spots 7, 9 and 27); together with other proteins, such as a putative glyoxylate induced protein, proteins containing dimeric alpha-beta barrel domains, and adenosine kinase-like proteins. Our results suggest that these proteins, together with related physiological processes, play an important role in the detoxification of excess Cu and in maintaining cellular homeostasis.
为了更好地理解植物中重金属胁迫响应和耐受性的相关机制,采用蛋白质组学方法研究了耐铜和对铜敏感水稻品种中铜结合蛋白表达的差异。使用一种新的固定金属离子亲和色谱(IMAC)方法分离经铜处理的水稻根中的铜结合蛋白,该方法在铜-IMAC柱之前应用亚氨基二乙酸-琼脂糖柱从蛋白质样品中去除金属离子。在二维凝胶中可重复检测到300多个蛋白点。与对照相比,35个蛋白点的强度变化大于1.5倍。24种蛋白质含有Smith等人报道的9种假定金属结合基序中的一种或多种,19种蛋白质(蛋白点)含有Kung等人报道的前6种基序中的1至3种。与对铜敏感的品种B1195相比,耐铜品种B1139中有7个蛋白点的强度增加(p<0.05),B1139中有6个蛋白点显著上调,但在B1195中未检测到。在铜胁迫下,B1139中有4个蛋白点显著上调,但B1195中未变化。相反,B1195中有2个蛋白点显著下调,但B1139中未变化。这些铜响应蛋白包括参与抗氧化防御和解毒的蛋白(蛋白点5、16、21、22、28、29和33)、发病机制相关蛋白(蛋白点5、16、21、22、28、29和33)、基因转录调控蛋白(蛋白点8和34)氨基酸合成相关蛋白(蛋白点8和34)、蛋白质合成、修饰、运输和降解相关蛋白(蛋白点1、2、4、10、15、19、30、31、32和35)、细胞壁合成相关蛋白(蛋白点14)、分子信号传导相关蛋白(蛋白点3)和盐胁迫相关蛋白(蛋白点7、9和27);以及其他蛋白质,如一种假定的乙醛酸诱导蛋白、含有二聚体α-β桶结构域的蛋白和腺苷激酶样蛋白。我们的结果表明,这些蛋白质以及相关的生理过程在过量铜的解毒和维持细胞稳态中起重要作用。