Belmont Ami P, Nossair Fadi, Brambilla Donald, Friedman Marjorie, Boswinkel Jan, Bradford Andrea B, Kwiatkowski Janet L
Division of Hematology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
RTI International, Rockville, MD.
J Pediatr. 2015 May;166(5):1226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.01.054.
To assess the rates and types of complications associated with deep sedation in children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and to explore potential risk factors.
This was a retrospective cohort study of children with SCD and a comparison group of children without SCD who underwent magnetic resonance imaging with deep sedation. The rates of general and SCD-associated sedation complications were calculated, and potential associated clinical and laboratory variables were assessed.
A total of 162 sedation records in 94 subjects with SCD and 324 sedation records in 321 subjects without SCD were assessed (mean age, 4.3 years in both groups). Pentobarbital, fentanyl, and midazolam were used in the majority of sedation episodes without routine presedation transfusion. Sedation-related complication rates did not differ significantly between the SCD and comparison groups. Within 1 month after the sedation procedure, 17 children (10%) experienced a vaso-occlusive pain episode (VOE), and 2 children (1.2%) developed acute chest syndrome. Preprocedure and postprocedure rates of these complications did not differ significantly. Subjects who developed VOE after sedation had a significantly higher VOE rate before sedation, but no other significant clinical or laboratory risk factors were identified.
Deep sedation in young children with SCD using a standard protocol is safe, with a sedation-related complication rate comparable to that of the general pediatric population. The observed rate of VOE, although not significantly higher than expected, warrants further investigation.
评估镰状细胞病(SCD)患儿深度镇静相关并发症的发生率及类型,并探索潜在危险因素。
这是一项对接受深度镇静磁共振成像的SCD患儿及无SCD患儿对照组的回顾性队列研究。计算了一般及SCD相关镇静并发症的发生率,并评估了潜在相关的临床和实验室变量。
共评估了94例SCD患儿的162份镇静记录以及321例无SCD患儿的324份镇静记录(两组平均年龄均为4.3岁)。大多数镇静过程使用了戊巴比妥、芬太尼和咪达唑仑,未进行常规的镇静前输血。SCD组与对照组的镇静相关并发症发生率无显著差异。在镇静程序后的1个月内,17名儿童(10%)经历了血管闭塞性疼痛发作(VOE),2名儿童(1.2%)发生了急性胸综合征。这些并发症的术前和术后发生率无显著差异。镇静后发生VOE的受试者在镇静前的VOE发生率显著更高,但未发现其他显著的临床或实验室危险因素。
采用标准方案对SCD幼儿进行深度镇静是安全的,镇静相关并发症发生率与一般儿科人群相当。观察到的VOE发生率虽然未显著高于预期,但仍需进一步研究。