Pinto António E, Pereira Teresa, Silva Giovani L, André Saudade
Serviço de Anatomia Patológica do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil (IPOLFG), E.P.E., R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal.
Centro de Estatística e Aplicações e Departamento de Matemática do Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.
Breast. 2015 Aug;24(4):449-55. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
Histological grade is a well-established prognostic/predictive factor in breast cancer. However, mainly within intermediate categories, patients may have unpredictable outcome. We hypothesised whether ploidy status can distinguish different prognostic groups among breast cancer patients with similar tumour grade.
The study involved 684 patients with invasive breast carcinoma, and median follow-up of 134.5 months. Pathological staging was evaluated according to WHO classification. Tumour differentiation was assessed using the Nottingham grading system. Ploidy was determined prospectively by DNA flow cytometry. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
There were 179 (26.2%) deaths and 239 (33.3%) disease recurrences. For grading, tumours were classified as follows: 163 (23.8%) G1, 356 (52.1%) G2 and 165 (24.1%) G3, while 389 (56.9%) tumours presented aneuploidy. Ploidy and grading are strongly associated (P < 0.001). Patients with aneuploid G2 tumours showed worse DFS (P = 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001), as well as those with aneuploid G1 tumours in relation to OS (P = 0.013). When a subset analysis was performed in early breast cancer patients (n = 451) with Stage I/IIA of disease, it remained the same significant associations of aneuploid G1 (to OS) and G2 tumours (to DFS and OS) with unfavourable prognosis.
Aneuploidy identifies subsets of breast cancer patients with G1 and G2 tumours who showed poor clinical outcome. The finding has therapeutic implications, as these patients are potential candidates to risk-adapted adjuvant therapy.
组织学分级是乳腺癌中一个公认的预后/预测因素。然而,主要在中间类别中,患者的预后可能无法预测。我们假设倍体状态是否能在肿瘤分级相似的乳腺癌患者中区分不同的预后组。
该研究纳入了684例浸润性乳腺癌患者,中位随访时间为134.5个月。根据WHO分类评估病理分期。使用诺丁汉分级系统评估肿瘤分化程度。通过DNA流式细胞术前瞻性地确定倍体。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。
有179例(26.2%)死亡和239例(33.3%)疾病复发。就分级而言,肿瘤分类如下:163例(23.8%)为G1级,356例(52.1%)为G2级,165例(24.1%)为G3级,而389例(56.9%)肿瘤呈现非整倍体。倍体与分级密切相关(P<0.001)。非整倍体G2肿瘤患者的DFS(P = 0.001)和OS(P<0.001)较差,非整倍体G1肿瘤患者的OS也较差(P = 0.013)。当对疾病处于I/IIA期的早期乳腺癌患者(n = 451)进行亚组分析时,非整倍体G1(与OS相关)和G2肿瘤(与DFS和OS相关)与不良预后之间仍存在相同的显著关联。
非整倍体可识别出G1和G2肿瘤的乳腺癌患者亚组,这些患者临床预后较差。这一发现具有治疗意义,因为这些患者是风险适应性辅助治疗的潜在候选者。